User talk:Glossologist/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Speedy deletion declined: Meshcherts people
Hello Glebchik. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Meshcherts people, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I can't see what's blatant about this. Explain rationale on my talk page, or take to AfD. Thanks. . Thank you. GedUK 21:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Glebchik! Since this is currently on AfD, procedurally I can no longer speedy it. I will, however, add my support for deletion. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 4, 2011; 14:13 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
Hi Glossologist. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 09:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. --glossologist (talk) 09:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
TB
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Bloomfield ?
Hi as you was involved in this article do you thing recent IP is reincarnation of user:Bloomfield, in the past he used IP from different location fowever. On another hand editing style has some similarities. M.K. (talk) 07:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. Nope, don't think so. Most likely it's commons:User:Alex Tora. Just take a look at anon's global contributions. --glossologist (talk) 01:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- I see. Yes it is looks like as you pointed. In any case I asked to protect the page. Hopefully this will reduce edit warring. Cheers, M.K. (talk) 06:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Colchester, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Colne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sala parish, Sala municipality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sala municipality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grāveri Parish may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
rm name in Polish, which is not an official language in the region
Hi,
thank You for your edit and corrections of my spelling mistakes. Please appoint a place in the text when removed Polish name Grodzieńszczyzna shall exist. However Polish language is not an official language of Belarus, it is a spoken language of biggest minority in Belarus to say nothing of it has been also official language of the region for five centuries till the 1945. Please apply your changes considering presented facts.
Best regards - Jedrzej Wolski (talk) 15:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- Cześć. This article is about an administrative division created in 1944, so I don't think translating its name into Polish and placing it into the lede and infobox is really reasonable. There is, however, indeed some sense in mentioning the Polish historic designation of the region Grodzieńszczyzna somewhere in the history section. --Regards, glossologist (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Notifying users about incident reports
Hey, just a friendly reminder to notify users when you open reports on them, as you recently did at AN3. (I've already informed User:73.178.187.55, so no need to worry about it this time.) larryv (talk) 02:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Consensus
You will need consensus first. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Glossologist. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Glossologist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Glossologist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)