Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gmann131! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grayson Rupp (May 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 23:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Deathworx for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deathworx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathworx until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Gmann131. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Grayson Rupp, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. signed, Rosguill talk 00:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dirt (band)

edit
 

The article Dirt (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

only source comes from musicbrainz, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 00:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  signed, Rosguill talk 00:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Grayson Rupp has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grayson Rupp. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply