GoBig22
I created an account three days ago:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GoBig22&diff=1076291605&oldid=1075827572
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GoBig22&action=history
Editor on Domino Masters is previously reverting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domino_Masters&diff=1076286035&oldid=1076285539
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domino_Masters&diff=1076242519&oldid=1076242298
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domino_Masters&diff=1076241543&oldid=1076241526
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domino_Masters&diff=1076239193&oldid=1076239105
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domino_Masters&action=history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Domino_Masters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maxxnite#Reverting/edit-warring
I reported editor in good faith and was blocked one week:
The ANI editor "sarcastically" responds to me and another editor/report:
"no problem" and "worth it" (i meant "no worries" actually) gets the reporting editor blocked site-wide?
I'm accused of "Battleground" and being "suspect" for joining a few/couple of days ago per User:El C!
so i guess only Admin are allowed to leave "tongue-in-cheek" remarks not "newbies" after two reverts
I don't need to be on here editing and was done editing Domino Masters which i innocently remarked
this is exactly why people vandalize on here and/or leave the site i'm guessing because of nonsense!
- I'm not gonna engage if you keep removing my comments ([1] [2][3]). Either you want to engage, or you don't. Pick one and stick to it, please. El_C 12:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- The message wasn't for you, it was actually just a record/archive i wanted to keep for future reference and views because i really should not be blocked, since i only did TWO different reverts then went to ANI like i'm supposed to. I also took it to the talk page to resolve for consensus and warned the disruptive editor. Regardless, it does not matter to me. It's a very petty issue and something i shouldn't be accused of. I noticed allot of ego/pride on here and it's not what i need in my life, so it's good this happened right away. I would rather spend my time doing something more meaningful. I will give you a bit of advice: do not bite the newcomers and assume good faith. Your remarks were not civil. Nor was the violating editor i reported. I expected this would happen. I see allot of problems on here and wonder why people don't report it. Now i know why. Same reason people don't go to the police about crimes nor intervene in wars i'm guessing. Sad world we live in. I have bigger fish to fry. You be well. P.s. Notice my "thank yous" and "pleases" when i left messages/summaries? I was polite. But yeah, you're right... [sarcastic] me being here means i'm up to no good three days later with a rando editor who was disrespectful even after being warned and reverted by other editors (check the history). GoBig22 (talk) 13:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- You ping'd me, GoBig22, by linking to my user name. Otherwise, I wouldn't have seen your message and would have thought that you stayed "retried" (retired after joining a couple of days ago, and getting into all these conflicts). Anyway, the levels of projection and misrepresentation in your above comment, it's something. Especially, the claims of acting in "good faith," which look more and more like WP:PACT conduct to me the more we continue to interact.
- In any case, I'm just not gonna bother replying beyond that, as I don't think you want me to. And I could barely read your message, anyway, with all the intentional miscapitalization of i and the no paragraph breaks, it's challenging to wade through. To reiterate: if you don't link my user name (ping), I probably wouldn't even know that you've responded further. See ya. El_C 16:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.