Your submission at Articles for creation: George Not Found (September 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 23:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gogysimper! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 23:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Not Found (September 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 16:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Gogysimper, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 02:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GeorgeNotFound (October 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There has already been a deletion discussion concerning GeorgeNotFound, and the subject has been found not to be notable. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeorgeNotFound. The title GeorgeNotFound has been locked as a redirect to DreamSMP and create-protected. Draft:GeorgeNotFound has already been resubmitted twice and has been rejected, and declined after being rejected, and is being rejected again. Resubmission is disruptive, and any further resubmission will be reported to WP:ANI with a request for a partial block.

If any editor really wants an article on GeorgeNotFound, then what they should do, instead of resubmitting this draft is:

  • 1. Accept that there is a consensus that the subject is not notable. Doing nothing may not accomplish anything, but it won't do any harm and is not disruptive.
  • 2. Discuss at a talk page. This probably will not result in the draft being accepted, but it might result in advice that is more useful than just resubmitting tendentiously.
  • 3. Discuss the salting of the redirect with User:Favonian. Do not expect that discussion will result in the article being accepted, but it might result in advice that is more useful than just resubmitting tendentiously.
  • 4. Request Deletion Review. Do not expect that discussion will result in the article being accepted, but it might result in an opportunity to resubmit the draft.

If this draft or any comparable draft is simply resubmitted tendentiously, a report will be made to WP:ANI to request a partial block.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:George Not Found has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:George Not Found. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeorgeNotFound.

Submitting this draft under two spellings of the name is gaming of titles and is disruptive. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:George Not Found

edit
 

Hello, Gogysimper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "George Not Found".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply