Regarding your edit to your user talk page

edit

I saw your edit summary for your recent edit to your user talk page (She deletes my comment from her page, I delete hers from mine. So it goes) and thought I'd let you know that I am not trying to sabatoge you. I removed your edit from my user talk page because it was a personal attack, albeit a small one. You are free to remove the template if you wish (I restored it by mistake a few minutes ago), but please don't turn this into a feud. --DearPrudence 04:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

(I restored it by mistake a few minutes ago)
I'm not sure how to phrase this without it being taken as another "personal attack", but you really, really need to be more careful with those bots and scripts. Gomer Bolstrood 04:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'm afraid I wasn't clear - what I meant was that I restored the template, thinking that it was in accordance with Wikipedia policy to do so. I then went searching for the page that stated this so I could explain to you why I had restored it, and found that you are in fact allowed to remove templates. I therefore restored it on purpose, but realised only afterward that doing so was a mistake. --DearPrudence 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PLATO Davis 1.jpg

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:PLATO Davis 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply