Gonefishingforgood

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Harassment by Simonm223

Sorry I have no clue what your name is. As I don't know what your name is I couldn't possibly have revealed it. The fact is that you changed your user ID, citing right to vanish and then immediately returned to the talk page of the GCP claiming to be a different person. This is a dishonest attempt to make it appear that consensus is other than it is. Since your subterfuge was rather transparent I saw nothing wrong with demonstrating I saw through it. Simonm223 (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I changed my name in good faith some time ago as I was unhappy that my username contained my personal name and could be misused. It had nothing to do with GCP and the previous changes made with L*****d are now attributed to Gonefishingforgood in the history, so there is no question of subterfuge or any form of sock puppetry. So your accusation of dishonesty is groundless and actually exacerbates the harassment. I did at one point wish to exercise my right to vanish as I have become so disillusioned with bad behaviour by editors on Wikipedia - but I then reconsidered as I thought that, maybe, I could make some improvements. How wrong I was.Gonefishingforgood (talk) 17:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry but considering your attempts to insert a Pro-GCP bias into the article and your previous attacks such as accusing me of WP:3RR violation after my first revert in a 24 hour period I am having trouble assuming good faith. Simonm223 (talk) 17:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Reversing an anti-GCP bias is not the same as introducing a pro-GCP bias. Your attitudes to NPOV are clear to see in your list of user contributions. Gonefishingforgood (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I employ no subterfuge in my editing. I believe my edits have, in general, improved Wikipedia within the boundaries of the project's regulations. If you feel otherwise you are welcome to your opinion. Simonm223 (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)