Goodmorningworld

This user approves of smart linking.

Please support the AdminReview initiative
A new project currently under discussion seeks to provide a way for editors to have valid grievances about individual administrators addressed in a focused manner. Your input is welcome here.

RfC Invitation

Within the past month or so, you appear to have commented on at least one AN/I, RS/N, or BLP/N thread involving the use of the term "Saint Pancake" in the Rachel Corrie article. As of May 24th, 2009, an RfC has been open at Talk:Rachel_Corrie#Request_for_Comments_on_the_inclusion_of_Saint_Pancake for over a week. As editors who have previously commented on at least one aspect of the dispute, your further participation is welcome and encouraged. Jclemens (talk) 23:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

History of Christian thought on tolerance and persecution

Hello Goodmorningworld! I love that user name! I am boring old Jenhawk777, and I have recently done some major reconstruction on the above mentioned article with the goal of improving its focus on what the title says it's about--Christian thought--broadening and extending its references and hopefully getting a consensus that the tags should be removed. I am going through the talk age contacting anyone who ever demonstrated any care for this article, and I am hoping that hasn't changed. I appreciated the balance and good will in your comments on the talk age there, so I am hoping you will bring that to giving the article a critique. I value your input. Don't be afraid to criticize or correct! Thank you Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Jenhawk777 I think I said to you once that "hooks are cheap" and indeed you can't loose much by asking. However, when the askee hasn't edited since 2010 I personally wouldn't bother. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Gråbergs Gråa Sång It's okay. I wasn't expecting everyone I asked to respond, but I do appreciate the heads up! Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Goodmorningworld! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Bethmanns and Rothschilds for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bethmanns and Rothschilds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethmanns and Rothschilds (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bethm002-4.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bethm002-4.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jonteemil (talk) 03:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)