Goodtablemanners
Welcome!
editHello, Goodtablemanners, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to S.t. Ghulam Shabir Shah Saryoudya School , Ghazipur. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Wikibhai110 (talk) 03:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Lau Sing Kee has a new comment
editYour thread has been archived
editHi Goodtablemanners! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lau Sing Kee has been accepted
editCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
SL93 (talk) 04:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editViolation of page restrictions at Donald Trump article
editHello Goodtablemanners! I know your a new editor here, and I'm just here to warn you about the Discretionary sanctions present at Donald Trump. There is a rule at Donald Trump called the "24-hr BRD cycle" which states, If a change you make to this article is reverted, you may not reinstate that change unless you discuss the issue on the talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit). Partial reverts/reinstatements that reasonably address objections of other editors are preferable to wholesale reverts.
You violated this rule after making this edit which was reverted here and reinstated by yourself. Be cautious of the sanctions on the Trump article because violating them can lead to the page sanction being enforced against you. Anytime you make a bold edit and it's reverted, go discuss it at the talk page. In this case, Talk:Donald Trump. Happy editing! Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 02:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notice
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:53, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Letting you know
editI'm letting you know that I referred to an edit you made, here: [1]. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Important Notice
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
WP:HOUNDING
editI would remind you to please read WP:HOUNDING. You haven't edited the Helms amendment article in the 7 years it's been in existence, and suddenly you arrived there simply because I recently edited it. Next step is ANI. Wes sideman (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
editYou have recently been editing abortion which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Blue Lives Matter
editAnother editor suggested that I report you to ANI for the WP:HOUNDING and the spurious report that you yourself filed, and I said I didn't think it was worth it. I may have been wrong to say that out loud, as you seem to have taken that as a signal that it's okay to continue hounding me, following me to Blue Lives Matter, another article that you never touched until I edited it. I can say that I'm very open now to filing a report. Knock it off. Wes sideman (talk) 15:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
The IP on my talk page was a sock harassing Wes sideman
editIn fact I'd say virtually any IP you see attacking him will be the same sock. So please just ignore the idiot. Doug Weller talk 09:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)