GooseChase1
July 2022
edit
Hello GooseChase1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:GooseChase1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=GooseChase1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Praxidicae, i have been trying to contact you for some time, left a message on your talk page as well, which was left unanswered.
About the subject, i have been working on this profile for a long time. It took at least a month for me to compile all of the new changes. I am not related to the subject in any way, neither do I expect to receive any financial consideration for these changes. I just want to make sure that my efforts do not go in vain. Thank you. GooseChase1 (talk) 20:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- So how are the images you uploaded your own work? PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:39, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
I tried to upload the picture under the license but Upload Wizard did not allow me. GooseChase1 (talk) 20:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Praxidicae, i have been expecting your response to our last conversation. Thank you. GooseChase1 (talk) 13:30, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.