Gordon Masterton
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
editHello, Gordon Masterton, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! henrik•talk 18:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
One more note
editI noticed you posted comments on the deletion discussion talk page. The usual convention here on Wikipedia is for those comments to be made on the deletion discussion page directly. Another user has moved them to the correct place for you, I hope you don't mind that.
Another tip: You can sign your comments by typing ~~~~ at the end of your comments on talk pages, which helps keep track of who wrote what :-) Sorry for the inconvenience - it is hard to understand all of wikipedia's multitude of policies directly, so please ask me if you have any questions at all. henrik•talk 18:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome and article:William Geddes
editThanks for creating the William george nicholson geddes article, another past-president off the list to do. I have added my support to it's deletion page and fortunately there seems to be overwhelming support to save it. Don't worry about the lower case name, it's an easy mistake to make and easily solveable.
If you are interested in more Civ Eng related topics please consider joining the WP:CEng project, this is a project that attempts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Civ Eng topics and we are always glad of new members. I have included the details below:
Finally if you have any questions regarding Wikiproject:Civil Engineering or the ICE past presidents listing please ask at my talk page and I will do my best to answer them for you. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 18:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
PS: as if to show how easy it is to make mistakes, initially I accidentally posted this to your user page instead of the talk page! Apologies for that.
RE:William Glanville
editGlad to see you back. Thanks for correcting the article, both the Royal Society and the Dictionary of National Biography have got it wrong in their biographies - its nice to see Wikipedia with a more correct article! Cheers, Dumelow (talk) 20:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Skype
editYou might note that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alan Muir Wood, also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Thank you.--Rumping (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Scottish Engineering Hall of Fame was accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)October 2013
editHello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Watson-Watt may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the fighters that close. Bowen decided that an airborne radar should not exceed 90 [[kilogram|kg]] (200 [[pound (mass)|lb]] in weight, 8 ft³ (230 [[litre|L]]) in volume, and require no more than
- greats-inducted-into-hall-of-fame-1.138454| accessdate = 2013-05-10 | publisher = [[The Courier]]}}</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Structural-Safety (June 9)
editPlease read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Draft:Structural-Safety concern
editHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Structural-Safety, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Structural-Safety
editHello Gordon Masterton. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Structural-Safety".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Structural-Safety}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Structural-Safety concern
editHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Structural-Safety, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Structural-Safety
editHello, Gordon Masterton. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Structural-Safety".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Structural-Safety concern
editHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Structural-Safety, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Article I mentioned
edit-
Article by Martin Poulter on libraries involving more people in an authentic experience through the digital world.
Your draft article, Draft:Structural-Safety
editHello, Gordon Masterton. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Structural-Safety".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin Let's talk! 10:47, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Category:Scottish Engineering Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion
editCategory:Scottish Engineering Hall of Fame, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Gordon Masterton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Gordon Masterton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Gordon Masterton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Scottish Engineering Hall of Fame
editHi @Gordon Masterton: I plan to recreate this category in a short moment, particularly when there is so many people in it and add them all in. If you see any that I have missed, can you add them in please. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 10:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)