Grammarfiend72

Welcome!

Hello, Grammarfiend72, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dialogue (Journal), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dialogue (Journal)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dialogue (Journal), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. in addition to the highly promotional tone, note that you also failed to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the journal or its publishers, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the journal claims or interviewing its management. I'll shortly restore the text here. Note that it is still liable for deletion, so remove it as soon as possible. I'll delete it anyway in a couple of days

If you consider writing about the journal again, in addition to the guidelines on notability, referencing and neutral tone, note that the correct title should be Dialogue (journal), and that if you have a conflict of interest regarding this journal, you must declare it.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jimfbleak, thank you very much for the full explanation. I actually had a problem with titling the page 'Dialogue (journal), as Wiki tells me there are already disambiguations that are covered by the title...any suggestions? I have taken a copy of the source - please feel free to delete, now. Understood, on all counts. Thank you for taking the time to explain. Grammarfiend72 (talk) 13:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

If you choose to recreate the article, create it at Dialogue (business journal), as this appears to be the best specific disambiguator for this particular journal. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Great - thank you! Grammarfiend72 (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dialogue (business journal) (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dialogue (business journal) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Grammarfiend72, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dialogue (business journal) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dialogue (business journal), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dialogue (business journal)

Hello, Grammarfiend72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dialogue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)