Welcome!

Raja Yoga controversy

edit

Dear Hinduism Project editors,

There was

a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga.  Please read the debate on the Hinduism  discussion page.  Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy.  Thank you. 68.239.78.172 15:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Grammatical error, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

I have seen that many of your edits are Hinduism related. You may want to join WikiProject Hinduism a project on Wikipedia to improve Hinduism imformation together. Thanks GizzaChat © 10:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yo!

edit

Namaste, Gram-ji (imagine anusvara atop "Gra"). So how do you feel about the fact that some belief articles are part of a "mythology" project but others are under "religion"? Basically, myth = widely held lie. Also, would you mind if I asked you some random questions about India, Hindi, Sanskrit, and Devanaagarii from time to time? Welcome to Wikipedia! Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 15:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

anymore to add in this cat?

edit

Category:Non-human races in Hindu mythology take a look to see if anything else should be added. --Dangerous-Boy 18:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't Garuda sometimes occur in the plural, as the name of a race? (Sorry, I'm just a random passerby) --Iustinus 17:43, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, checking the Garuda article, I see that there is indeed a race of "garudas", but this is in Buddhism, not Hinduism. Sorry for the confusion! --Iustinus 19:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

malayalam

edit

Hi,

Could you explain your change to the Malayalam example in Inclusive and exclusive we? Is it underspelled ñaṅṅaL, but really starts with a prenasalized stop, ñjaṅṅaL ?

kwami 20:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, my mistake (I thought ñ was supposed to be like the spanish letter, which is slightly different).--Grammatical error 06:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Explanation

edit

Yes, I can explain it. It was an error. --ScienceApologist 20:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Naming and transliteration to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Vedic)

edit

Trying to a get a concensus on this. Your input is appreciated. I'm trying to move the naming and transliteration formating to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Vedic).--Dangerous-Boy 08:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead and merge it.--Dangerous-Boy 23:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

List of Rakshasas

edit

finally started it. Care to add?--Dangerous-Boy 06:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

needs some feed back on Template:Hdeity infobox

edit

check it out.--Dangerous-Boy 08:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

everything is fixed! you can start inserting it into the Hindu deity articles. Check out Indra. --Dangerous-Boy 10:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Śakra / Indra

edit

Yes, the name or epithet of Śakra is sometimes used for Indra (though in the text of the Vishnupurana you linked to the identity wasn't always clear, and in one case it may have been used for a different deity). But the primary distinction that needs to be made here is between the Buddhist and the Hindu deities. Even if the names used were exactly the same, they have different myths and different status in the respective religions, and you can't assume that because something is true of the Hindu Śakra that it's true of the Buddhist Śakra, or vice versa. As far as the names go, Śakra (or Sakka) is very common in Buddhist texts, and Indra is rare, and half the time Indra appears it could be interpreted as an ordinary noun. In Hindu texts Śakra for Indra may not be uncommon (I don't know this) but Indra is certainly both more common and older. So it makes sense to split up the articles with Śakra for the Buddhist deity, Indra for the Hindu one, and a brief note in both indicating how the word is used in the other religion. RandomCritic 22:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I thought the whole point of buddhism was to have no gods and rejection of the vedas. I really see the need for separation of such things because without the Hindu gods for a base there wouldn't be any buddhist ones. Never understood why buddhism tries to be so separate.--Dangerous-Boy 10:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but the personalities and histories of the Hindu gods were changed after being adopted into Buddhism. I can see why Śakra should be a separate article, as people looking for Buddhism-related information would be confused were it a redirect to Indra. However, the likes of Yama certainly don't need separate articles detailing the Buddhist view. --Grammatical error 15:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Any help would be appreciated. Maybe sort out what doesn't need to be expanded or make a complete todo list. Remove whatever articles you see fit.--Dangerous-Boy 10:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Dental nasal revert?

edit

Ask Kwami about that. Denelson83 14:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

little help in hindu myth cat.

edit

Venu62 (talk · contribs) added the hindu myth to a lot of hindu kingdoms. this is unneeded since they are already organized under Category:Ancient Hindu kingdoms which is a subcat in Hindu myth. can you help in removing the cat?--D-Boy 08:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

M. Night Shyamalan

edit

Hello! Can you check up on this article? They are having a discussion about the pronounciation of his name. Since you are familiar with phonetics (you are, right?) could you please provide a correct pronounciation guide? I dont know how to get the ' ള ' sound accross in English (I dont know phonetics). Cheers! -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK06:34, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK07:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rakshasa (fiction)

edit

Is there any better cat, then? In general, I try to keep specific articles out of Category:Fictional characters itself, and instead have them stored down in the sub categories. Category:Fictional characters can easily become very, very, very cluttered if this is not done. It had hundreds of articles directly in it before I started regularly pushing articles down to more specific subcategories. So if you can think of a more specific category somewhere under Category:Fictional characters, it would be greatly appreciated. - TexasAndroid 14:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maybe Category:Fictional species? - TexasAndroid 14:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
The PD cat works, but leaves something missing. The Myth in fiction cat you propose seems to fill that. We would need to see about getting the new cat correctly populated, but I think that it could work. Do you have any problem with the new cate sitting under Category:Mythological characters itself? That could show nicely how it is separated out from just mythological characters where you had a problem with my moving the Rakshasa cat. - TexasAndroid 15:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Or better. Remove Myth Char from Fic char, put MCiF under MC and FC. Then MC itself is for the original mythological characters themselves, without any link to fictional nature, and MCiF sits below it, with the fictional parent as well. Let me set this up, and let me know what you think... - TexasAndroid 15:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ok. I just got a *bunch* of them subbed into it by adding MCiF as a parent to Mythology in comics. That right there gives us a large bunch of the comics stuff already, without needing to toss individual pages in. - TexasAndroid 15:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Can you please add Wikipedia talk:Notice board for India-related topics/Kerala to your watchlist, so that you don't miss out on the Kerala related discussions? Thanks! -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK10:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hindi

edit

I made many corrections in the Hindi page; your phonetic transcriptions were wrong and I had to manually revert them.Cygnus_hansa 12:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Request again

edit

Hi! Could you add a pronunciation guide for the Sabarimala article. All the national channels are pronouncing it incorrectly in the news. Thanks!-- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK02:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pradip Somasundaran

edit

This is a message to all Category:Kerala Wikipedians

I want your opinion on this particular person Pradip Somasundaran. He claims to be a famous singer in Kerala. Now being a Malayalee, I have not heard of this person before, so I wonder whether or not you have heard of him before and set this issue straight. If so, then please let your opinion be counted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradip Somasundaran. Please note that by voicing your opinion as a Malayalee/Keralite will add more weight to your words.

Many Thanks --Ageo020 21:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hindu religious figures infobox

edit

You input is appreciated. Place your comments at User talk:Nightngle--D-Boy 20:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Translation

edit

Need malayam translators.--D-Boy 20:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sri Anandamoyi Ma

edit

The article on Sri Anandamoyi Ma is in serious shambles. Help wanted. Aditya Kabir 16:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mappila Malayalam

edit

In view of your contributions to Malayalam language, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mappila Malayalam may benefit from your input. Please consider participating in that discussion. -- Jreferee t/c 06:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Tom Dobin

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Tom Dobin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GlobeGores (talk) 11:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tom Dobin

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tom Dobin, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. GlobeGores (talk) 17:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Tom Dobin

edit

Tom Dobin, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Tom Dobin satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Dobin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Tom Dobin during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GlobeGores (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Tom Dobin

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Tom Dobin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hammer1980·talk 18:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

edit
 

Hi Grammatical error,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Hinduism

edit
 


Hello, Grammatical error. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!





Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply