Granvillle

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Michaels (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Domdeparis was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Michaels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Domdeparis (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Granvillle, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Domdeparis (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft Brian Michaels

Hallo Domdeparis, I would like to ask you for an explanation concerning your decision to reject the article that I have proposed. I suspect that the theatre and opera director, Brian Michaels – despite being born and bred in London – is of little interest for the British Wikipedia readers. He is active worldwide as a director, teacher and artist, but not in the UK. He is a true cosmopolitan, and in that respect more than a British citizen. The majority of the references have used, relate to his activities around the world. Does this have no significance for the UK? Very strange !

To be honest I can't understand this at all. And to be honest I find the reasons given for rejecting the article, unconvincing. How shall we proceed? I find the comments that you have made unsatisfactory, and therefore I don't think that the Tea House is the right place to continue – and I simply don't have that amount of time available.

To summarise: I consider the artistic work of Brian Michaels, to be of the highest value. His work in the theatre is seen as innovative and unconventional by critics, students, and colleagues, wherever he has worked. I respectfully request that you reconsider your negative decision. If you were to meet Brian Michaels, you would agree with me. --Granvillle (talk) 11:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Granville, if I understand rightly you are relatively close to the subject of the article? judging by the promotional tone of some of the phrases and your passionate message about this person I think this may be the case, you may want to read WP:COI. Notability is a relatively subjective thing but there are some basics that you might want to read and maybe after having read them you will be more convinced by my reasons and find them less unsatisfactory. The invitation to the teahouse is automatically added when an article is rejected. Before sending this message I hope that you took the time to click on the different links to try and understand the reasons despite your professed lack of time. Just for your information I am British but I live in France and have several close relatives who works in opera so I am not looking at your article from the point of view that you suggest. Despite that the sources that you have added are not enough to prove notability. The guidelines state that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." the great majority of your sources are affiliated sources as in they are the theatres and festivals that he has worked for. I pointed out that the article in the LA Times is the kind of thing that is needed but one source is not enough. The phrase about "the internationally renowned" nadia kevan with her own web site as a source smacks of WP:PROMOTION and WP:LINKSPAM and should be removed. If you can find more WP:RS clean up the tone of the article and remove the spam I will be happy to review the article again. Domdeparis (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks Domdeparis, I will try my very best--Granvillle (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Once more Draft Brian Michaels

Hallo Domdeparis, thank you again for your constructive reply. There is a major article featuring Brian Michaels' Shakespeare work, appearing shortly in a special edition of the journal Shakespeare in Southern Africa (SSA). The theme is Decolonising Shakespeare and will be published this year. Should I perhaps wait until it is available online before re-submitting the article? I have found some other relevant links, including one in French. Thanks for your help --Granvillle (talk) 10:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your welcome, thanks for the kind words, it's not an easy task reviewing as a lot of editors get huffy when then work is rejected or criticised (even constructively). Add the links that you have and I'll have a look, it doesn't matter what language they are in and if they are in French that's even better as it's the language I have been using daily for the last 25 years! Domdeparis (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Brian Michaels - new attempt

Hallo Domdeparis, I’ve had another go at the Wikipedia article about Brian Michaels. Could you be so kind and take a look? Please let me know if the article works this way. Best regards --Granvillle (talk) 08:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Michaels has been accepted

Brian Michaels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lacypaperclip (talk) 03:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello Lacypaperclip, I would just like to say thank you for your help. A pleasure cooperating with you --Granvillle (talk) 12:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)