User talk:Grayshi/Archive/03

I saw your revert on the Horizon League tournament. If possible those parts of the bracket should either be removed or say "BYE" because the way it is now is somewhat confusing.

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 01:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: Francophonie

Please use better judgement when reverting a correction (in edit summary); I have restored 'polities', as 'politics' in the lead makes no sense as is. Thank you.

"Jesse50"

Thanks for the heads up/revert. He's a persistent one; he's got something like 125 or so sockpuppets that he's tried to use on an ongoing basis. --Mhking (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Your Header Image

Hey... What program did you use to make that animated gif? Ive been looking for a nice one but I haven't found one. Cheers!

--Wyatt915✍ 23:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!!! --Wyatt915✍ 23:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Explanation

When adding to an article, please be very careful to not delete (blank) earlier content, which in this case was all very carefully selected to produce the most encyclopedic article possible. Thank you for this consideration. Badagnani (talk) 19:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Recommendation

I hope you don't mind a bit of advise: Ignore the incivility and disruption per this extremely helpful essay. Follow WP:DR, be civil, don't get caught up in the drama. --Ronz (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

At some point, ignoring isn't enough. If you want to start an RfC/U, I'll participate as well. --Ronz (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

If you start a RFC, I bet definitely more than 10 editors on good standings would join in you. Several admins have recommended it already.--Caspian blue 19:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Isn't mediation already under way? If you think the RFC will be useful go for it, but I suggest focusing on the actual dispute. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Are you talking to me or Eugene2x? Well, the content dispute is being dealt by the meditation, but RFC/U is purely on user conduct.--Caspian blue 19:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Mediation Underway

Hello. I am your mediator that you requested to solve your situation in this article. Please come to this mediation page and state your side of this issue in clear terms. I have tried to read over the talk in question and it is circular. I wish to clear up this issue. Thank you. --NewSinew (talk) 15:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Badagnani is quite a problematic editor who, not only on your medation case, but on nearly all List of X-Americans, reverts and calls for fake 'discussions' OR 'consensus' he never participates in. He uses the same cookie-cutter response on those articles too 'rv massive page blanking; see talk'. That type of BS. Check out the list of Hungarian Americans, as well as the history of List of Norwegian Americans. Bulldog 21:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I have been made very aware of the situation with Badagnani. I am aware of his previous track record at this time and we will see about the results of the mediation; it is likely drawing to a close. Thank you for your input. --iAdem (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Badagnani RFC

Thank you for the notice, I will join in it. I think getting broader opinions from editors who've known him and edited with him for a long time would be helpful as well.--Caspian blue 23:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Although I don't know you at all, but I truly sympathize your agonies to keep Wikipedia "encyclopedic".--Caspian blue 02:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

A bit of salt

Finally, the conversation (?) containing various dreadful "curse" and vengeful threats" poured by the rude editor is deleted. I think you'd better walk away from the ice creme article because that does not look good for yourself since the DR is ongoing.--Caspian blue 02:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Angry Lamb Studios Article

Hey, I wrote that article. You posted a suggestion: strong delete claiming i had no sources, but I do. Please help me get it right. I did not write this article to advertise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsf8336 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Angry Lamb Studios Article Cont'd

The website is elevenmusicmag.com But that does make sense. There is an article about Ty Fyffe that makes many claims and has no sources whatsoever. How come no one is jumping all over that one? Jsf8336 (talk) 01:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

One Last Thing

Thanks for helping me. I'm not trying to be annoying. I am really interested in wiki and how to use it properly. My last question is: If what you say is true and the Ty Fyffe article qualifies for speedy deletion, why is it that within 10 minutes of posting my articles this afternoon people were all over them trying to get rid of them and this Ty Fyffe one managed to slip by. How does that work? How do you guys even find new articles to review? I find it very interesting.Jsf8336 (talk) 01:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page.

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks--Abce2 (talk) 02:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Please join us

Hi. Would you mind joining us on the talk page at Talk:List of liqueurs? That page has recently been the subject of dispute over redlinks and external links, and if we can be sure we're all on the same page, it would save a lot of reverting. Thanks in advance. -GTBacchus^(talk) 02:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Your recent rollback(s)

Hi, I just happened to find that you made a rollback that I don't see how it could be justified. However, I do not know the subject of the article, so can you explain this? Thanks!. —Mythdon t/c 06:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

The insertion of "Bill Clinton" in the article and an odd rewording made me believe that it might have been vandalism of some sort, and AFAIK, Huggle does not allow anyone to use the undo feature. GraYoshi2x►^talk 17:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:About Badagnani

Thank you very much for suggestions, I'll remember them. In my opinion, Badagnani isn't a bad editor but I couldn't understand him, so I try to work with him through discussion and avoid edit-wars at all cost.--Amore Mio (talk) 02:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

• License update: Licensing vote begins
• News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
• Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

• Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
• Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
• News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
• Dispatches: Valued pictures
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gamelan ensembles in the United States (2nd nomination)

As you made the original nomination for this article, you may be interested in the above. Black Kite 19:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

An discussion on some of your recent editing has been started here --Ronz (talk) 02:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)