GreatHarridan
Joined 10 March 2020
Latest comment: 3 years ago by GreatHarridan in topic February 2021
This is GreatHarridan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyla Mae Olson (September 30)
edit Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tom (LT) was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lyla Mae Olson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lyla Mae Olson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, GreatHarridan!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tom (LT) (talk) 23:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
|
February 2021
editHi GreatHarridan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Syllabub that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Spudlace (talk) 21:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
@Spudlace: My fault. Still getting the hang of this. Yes, you are correct - not a minor edit at all. Weirdly pleased people are keeping track of syllabub. GreatHarridan (talk) 21:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)