Greek Fellows

Catch me if you can!

In response to your feedback

And why does this make you sad? I can only see one edit under your account above, but am quite sure you are no stranger to Wikipedia. Lectonar (talk) 12:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, sometimes I forget to log in, and most of the time I edit on other languages of Wikipedia. When so, my edits are sometimes rejected, with the reason 'Not constructive' and so on. Greek Fellows (talk) 13:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wonderfl.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 12:54, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wonderfl concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wonderfl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Wonderfl

Hello Greek Fellows. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Wonderfl.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wonderfl}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Math formatting

Greek, I reverted your edits on Phillips curve and Aggregate demand as they introduced several parsing errors. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

@Oiyarbepsy How? I checked the revisions and saw no errors. --Worst regards, Greek Fellows". Visit ma talk page and ma contributions. 01:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Here's what I see: At the article Aggregate demand, this revision, section Debt, I see this text:

A Post-Keynesian theory of aggregate demand emphasizes the role of debt, which it considers a fundamental component of aggregate demand;[5] the contribution of change in debt to aggregate demand is referred to by some as the credit impulse.[6] Aggregate demand is spending, be it on consumption, investment, or other categories. Spending is related to income via:

Failed to parse (lexing error): \mathrm{income} - \mathrm{spending} = \mathrm{net\: savings} Rearranging this yields:

Failed to parse (lexing error): \mathrm{spending} = \mathrm{income} - \mathrm{net\: savings} = \mathrm{income} + \mathrm{net\: increase\: in\: debt}

In words: what you spend is what you earn, plus what you borrow: if you spend $110 and earned $100, then you must have net borrowed $10; conversely if you spend $90 and earn $100, then you have net savings of $10, or have reduced debt by $10, for net change in debt of –$10.

Of course, the error message is in big red text. If you're not seeing this, there is some more complicated problem going on, and maybe we need to take it to Village Pump Technical. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:57, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

@Oiyarbepsy looks pretty fine to me.

A Post-Keynesian theory of aggregate demand emphasizes the role of debt, which it considers a fundamental component of aggregate demand;[5] the contribution of change in debt to aggregate demand is referred to by some as the credit impulse.[6] Aggregate demand is spending, be it on consumption, investment, or other categories. Spending is related to income via:

income−spending=netsavings Rearranging this yields:

spending=income−netsavings=income+netincreaseindebt

In words: what you spend is what you earn, plus what you borrow: if you spend $110 and earned $100, then you must have net borrowed $10; conversely if you spend $90 and earn $100, then you have net savings of $10, or have reduced debt by $10, for net change in debt of –$10.

If you see a little box on the bottom-left corner of your page saying "Typesetting math..." or anything alike, wait till it gets to 100%. Before it finishes typesetting, there WILL be failed-to-parse errors. --Worst regards, Greek Fellows". Visit ma talk page and ma contributions. 04:16, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 133#Math parsing problem. It's still not working for me, so maybe the folks there can understand why. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)