This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Green Green Wave (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

sorry my friend tried to login from my computer, i will make sure it will never happen again, please unblock me

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Green Green Wave, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 23:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

SwisterTwister talk 23:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyril Peretti (September 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 04:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Green Green Wave, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 04:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyril Peretti (September 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yann (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mark Antony Rossi

edit
 

The article Mark Antony Rossi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already removed all the spam refs and unreliable blog refs. Don't know how a book supposedly only out a week is out of print. Books mostly are self-published thru Amazon or his own publishing firm. What's left of the refs to his poems, reprinted announcements and webzine type sites. Article appears to be done by person being payed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 04:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: ATG (All Stars Travel Group) (September 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Anna Lakomy has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anna Lakomy. Thanks! Rankersbo (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Lakomy (September 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 17:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Bob Pressner has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bob Pressner. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GPSWOX (September 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SSTflyer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
sstflyer 13:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GPSWOX (September 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalyan C. Kankanala (October 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GPSWOX (October 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 18:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Golden Veil

edit
 

The article Golden Veil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't pass WP:NOTFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Happysailor (Talk) 22:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:GPSWOX

edit

  Draft:GPSWOX, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:GPSWOX and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:GPSWOX during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 20:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Cyril Peretti

edit

  Draft:Cyril Peretti, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cyril Peretti and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Cyril Peretti during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 20:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:ATG (All Stars Travel Group)

edit

  Draft:ATG (All Stars Travel Group), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ATG (All Stars Travel Group) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:ATG (All Stars Travel Group) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 20:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr. Wendy M. O’Connor

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr. Wendy M. O’Connor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 20:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Sujitmoto Group

edit

  Draft:Sujitmoto Group, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sujitmoto Group and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sujitmoto Group during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 20:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wispa Kicks

edit
 

The article Wispa Kicks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

promotional article by now-banned editor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Bob Pressner has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bob Pressner. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 18:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Bob Pressner concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bob Pressner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bob Pressner

edit
 

Hello, Green Green Wave. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bob Pressner".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 17:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:The Wake up Foundation concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Wake up Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Wake up Foundation

edit
 

Hello, Green Green Wave. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Wake up Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply