Grew Baddymore
July 2023
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Skullgirls, you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please stop your disruptive editing. The original wording is sufficient, you are adding sources considered unreliable. You've been told this. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sure, I hope, this time is the good one, I followed all the indication, also by Wani. Grew Baddymore (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- There is nothing wrong with using the Polygon article. The sentences used in the Wikipedia page are from the first paragraph of the Polygon article, so we must cite it here. Yes, the writer for Polygon has a strong stance on the matter, but that is irrelevant. Polygon is only being used in this case to 1) state the review bombing took place, and 2) list some examples of the patch changes. Also, I'm going to remind you again about WP:3RR. Wani (talk) 23:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- So lemme get this straight, the only problem was the Polygon article and yet instead of easily adding it you preferred to revert completely my edits, plus, Polygon, that like Kotaku has already been officially blacklisted, can be used as a completely reliable source no matter how biased, unprofessional, politically-driven and hostile towards gamers, devs and readers their article written by different authors could be but we cannot use BIC articles anymore even if they are written in good faith and with proper language? I'm risking to be blocked for this? No offense, but sounds a little hypocritical to me. Grew Baddymore (talk) 06:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- There is nothing wrong with using the Polygon article. The sentences used in the Wikipedia page are from the first paragraph of the Polygon article, so we must cite it here. Yes, the writer for Polygon has a strong stance on the matter, but that is irrelevant. Polygon is only being used in this case to 1) state the review bombing took place, and 2) list some examples of the patch changes. Also, I'm going to remind you again about WP:3RR. Wani (talk) 23:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sure, I hope, this time is the good one, I followed all the indication, also by Wani. Grew Baddymore (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please stop your disruptive editing. The original wording is sufficient, you are adding sources considered unreliable. You've been told this. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Skullgirls shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 07:05, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have said several times that Niche Gamer is not a reliable source. Why are you insisting on adding it in? The article and its wording was fine as it was. You have to WP:DROPTHESTICK, stop pushing for your incorrect and inappropriate revision and start discussing the issue instead of reverting again and again. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- First, since when and why Niche Gamer is not a reliable source, since even their reviews are collected on aggregators? Plus, we were talking about Bounding Into Comics, not Niche Gamer, this is new. Grew Baddymore (talk) 07:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have said several times that Niche Gamer is not a reliable source. Why are you insisting on adding it in? The article and its wording was fine as it was. You have to WP:DROPTHESTICK, stop pushing for your incorrect and inappropriate revision and start discussing the issue instead of reverting again and again. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)