Welcome!

Hello, Grotte, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Flockmeal 21:30, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ballpark estimate

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Ballpark estimate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 13:26, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of BIMwash

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article BIMwash, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article seems to be un-notable and non-informational

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. John Collier (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of BIMwash

edit

I have nominated BIMwash, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIMwash. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
  The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Målade påskägg i Sverige

edit

Discusssion moved to Talk:Easter_egg#Målade påskägg i Sverige.

Hello, and thanks for creating this article. It's been tagged for notability for 5 years. Could you look it over and see if you think it meets [[WP:NOTABILTY}}? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk)

‎  ‎

Nomination of Iplist for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iplist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iplist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Revert of my edits on Chihuahua (dog)

edit

Hello, can I ask why you undid my edits (link) on the chihuahua article? The images I removed don't contribute to the article at all, and the article is quite cluttered with "my puppy is cuter than your puppy" as it is.--TKK bark ! 12:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pictures are very descriptive, there should be some pictures of normal dogs, not only skeletons and obese dogs etc. Most dog articles contains many pictures, I don't see that as a problem. If the layout is a problem the pictures should be rearranged, some of them maybe should be a bit smaller.Grotte (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Structural robustness

edit
 

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Structural robustness, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.steelconstruction.info/Structural_robustness.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

It must be. Grotte (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shop drawing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of computer-aided design editors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to FEA, STEP, CAE, Trimble, CAM and Primavera

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Finnish or Estonian

edit

It has been established quite clearly that this person is an Estonian engineer working for Finnish company. Why do you revert this again? ~~Xil (talk) 08:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Where did you find this information? He works for a finish company in Finland, does not that make him a Finish engineer? Or are you talking about where he was once born? Grotte (talk) 08:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
It has been all over the news in Latvia and the references in article are to Estonian media. People happen to work in foreign countries, that doesn't make them nationals of those countries ~~Xil (talk) 08:58, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
But I can not find any where that he is estonian, any how this is probably just a matter of English language use. Being a Finnish engineer, or more precise not working in Estonia, is what gives him creditability. So it should be mentioned in some way. The estonian president for some reason wanted foreign involvement in this matter. --Grotte (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Grotte. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply