User talk:Guacpocalypse

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Guacpocalypse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
• Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• How to add those all-important references
• Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 08:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Ranchers (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ClaudineChionh were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good Ranchers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 05:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Good Ranchers

Hello, Guacpocalypse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Good Ranchers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a new RfC at Tetris

Hello, I am inviting you to participate in an RfC currently being held at Talk:Tetris#RFC on How to Define Tetris. This RfC seeks to garner consensus on whether to define Tetris as a video game or a video game series and whether to add a footnote representing the contradicting sources.

Currently, the RfC has stalled with few participants. Given your participation at the prior RfC, which had a similar question but had an inconclusive closing comment, your input would be very much appreciated. Lazman321 (talk) 00:03, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

Hello Guacpocalypse! Your additions to The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mellamelina (talk) 00:32, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying this. If I summarize in my own words what was on there, is that acceptable? ^🥑GUACPOCALYPSE^🥑 22:24, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Episode summaries are generally written by people who have watched the episodes and can summarize them in their own words. You can refer to MOS:TVPLOT as well as WP:COPYPASTE and WP:PARAPHRASE for further information. Mellamelina (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok I could summarize based on that at some point. Thanks. ^🥑GUACPOCALYPSE^🥑 22:49, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Candace Owens

Hello, Guacpocalypse. Just so you know, I removed some of the content that you recently added to Candace Owens because it was sourced to the New York Post, which is considered generally unreliable. Contentious material in biographies of living persons must be sourced to reliable sources, per WP:BLPSOURCES. If you have a reliable source for that content, then feel free to add it back in citing that source, and please try to avoid using unreliable sources in the future. Thanks. Opm581 ^{(talk | he/him)} 23:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the improvement. I saw it on the reliable sources list as both moderately reliable and not, but just now noticed the reference to living persons. Thank you! ^🥑GUACPOCALYPSE^🥑 22:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)