Gueneverey
){kind=link}
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Juice of the Barley, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hend/songs/JuiceOfTheBarley.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problems
editHello. Concerning your contribution, The Juice of the Barley, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.qmcorp.net/websongs/juice_barley.pdf. As a copyright violation, The Juice of the Barley appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Juice of the Barley has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Juice of the Barley and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The Juice of the Barley with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Juice of the Barley.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Truthanado (talk) 03:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Twilight Festival
editHello, I noticed you removed the categories "Festivals in the United States" and "Festivals" from the Twilight Festival page. Why do you think the page doesn't belong in these categories? It's a festival and it's in the United States. Me5000 (talk) 00:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Twilight Festival is a festival in Missouri. That is the correct category it should be in. The "Festivals in Missouri" category falls under "Festivals in the United States." Which falls under "festivals." Therefore, the article doesn't need to be in all three categories. If we put every festival in every state and every country into the "Festival" category, it would be completely useless to help people find anything. Make sense? Gueneverey (talk) 00:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, that makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up. Me5000 (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Removal of Alternative energy category from Plug Power
editI just noticed that you removed the Alternative energy category from Plug Power, could you explain the reasoning for this. They design and manufacture fuel cells, which is listed as an alternative energy. Onlynone (talk) 16:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Plug Power is already in the fuel cell category...which is in the alternative energy category. So it's redundant to put the article in both. If we put every fuel cell manufacturer and every wind turbine manufacturer and every solar cell manufacturer under alternative energy, the category would be useless for helping people find anything. Make sense? --Gueneverey (talk) 01:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response, I can see the alternative energy category holds higher level articles. While looking at the category I also noticed that there are two user subpages (User:Anthony717/sandbox, and User:Meco/Advanced_Energy_Research_Organization) that are in the alternative energy category. The first looks to be a copy of Wave power at some point in the past, and the second looks like a work in progress for a new article. Do you think they should be removed from this (and other) categories as well? Onlynone (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm not sure what to do with those articles. The first one especially seems unnecessary. Maybe ask those guys what's up? Also, maybe you noticed somebody removed Plug Power from the fuel cell category yesterday, because that cat's apparently only for types of fuel cells. So I took the liberty of creating a new category of "Fuel cell manufacturers," and hopefully this darn article is really in the right place now. =) --Gueneverey (talk) 00:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikiproject Environment
editHello and welcome to wikiproject environment!--Alex Marshall (talk) 09:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Happy to be here! --Gueneverey (talk) 00:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Request for comment on Category Redirect template
editBecause you are a member of WikiProject Categories, your input is invited on some proposed changes to the design of the {{Category redirect}} template. Please feel free to view the proposals and comment on the template talk page. --Russ (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Apocalyptica site
editAs much as I'd love to have this site added, as I agree it is a useful site, it is unfortunately against Wikipedia policy to list fansites, which I think would include the second link - seems a shame though, as I have to admit it does contain a fair amount of information. ≈ The Haunted Angel 20:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Would you be so kind as to offer a third opinion on the (rather trivial) dispute here? Thanks, Jfire (talk) 08:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oops, looks like I'm a bit late for the debate...it seems you got everything sorted out. Or are you still looking for another opinion about Ballard? Either way, I'll keep a watch on the article in case you have issues in the future. --Gueneverey (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I think we reached a consensus. Thanks for taking a look! Jfire (talk) 18:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
editThank you for pointing that out to me.
Samuel Pakalomattam (signed out) (talk) 00:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Waltons Guitar Festival of Ireland
edit
Image copyright problem with Image:Harmageddon.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Harmageddon.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
No content in Category:Albion Country Band albums
edit
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Albion Country Band albums, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Hope Vol2.jpg
edit
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Harmageddon.jpg
edit
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Wuthering Heights (band)
The article Wuthering Heights (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Only sources are primary or blank Allmusic listings which contain no info other than track listings.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Path Vol2.jpg)
edit){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:Path Vol2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Renaissance fair has been nominated for discussion
edit
Orphaned non-free image File:Heathenreel.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Memories of Middle Earth for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memories of Middle Earth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 00:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Memories of Middle Earth.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Irish Drinking Songs for Cat Lovers for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish Drinking Songs for Cat Lovers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 22:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Holy Grail of Irish Drinking Songs.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Drinking Songs for Cat Lovers.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gullible's Travels (Brobdingnagian Bards album) for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gullible's Travels (Brobdingnagian Bards album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Marked by Great Size for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marked by Great Size until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Songs of the Muse for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs of the Muse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Orphaned non-free image File:Gullible's Travels.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marked by Great Size.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Songs of the Muse.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Orphanage (band) albums
edit
A tag has been placed on Category:Orphanage (band) albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)