Guildford Lane Gallery
I need to declare a COI here as I do work for the gallery. I have tried to write a page for the gallery that is unbiased, factual and unemotional. I think I've kept adjectives to a minimum and have certainly avoided hyperbole but welcome any editorial offered. Thanks!
October 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Guildford lane gallery, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)