Guillaume Ghisbain

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dasypoda delectabilis (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Edward-Woodrow was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dasypoda delectabilis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Edward.

I have improved the sections by providing more inline citations that support the statements.

Best wishes, Guillaume 2A02:A020:3CA:C89C:F9FB:1732:DE38:D157 (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Guillaume Ghisbain! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dasypoda delectabilis has been accepted

Dasypoda delectabilis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Guillaume Ghisbain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Dasypoda delectabilis, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! UtherSRG (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Dear UtherSRG,

Many thanks for your message. I would be very happy for anyone to proofread and help me improve the page. Although I feel that I am the right candidate to write that page (as I described the species myself and went through the scientific journal's peer-review myself), I understand the concerns associated with conflicts of interest.

Can I please ask you or another editor to proofread my work?

Thank you for your time,

Guillaume Guillaume Ghisbain (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

The (boiler plate) note is intended to act as a caution when moving forward. You did the right thing by writing the article as a draft as it then went through the AFC review process. However, future edits should be done using the {{edit COI}} tag on the article's talk page, or by using the Edit Request Wizard, whichever you find easier to use. Future articles you have a similar level of direct knowledge and interest in should also be written via draft, and other existing articles in a similar relationship should be updated with requests. Feel free to directly edit articles where there would not be an appearance of conflict of interest.

On another note, Dasypoda delectabilis is only sourced to primary sources that uphold the information about this species (ie. your research and that of your co-researchers), with two secondary/tertiary sources about broader taxa. This is what we call a non-neutral point of view. It would be good to add information from secondary/tertiary sources that discuss this species, or from sources that may have another perspective on the subject. Of course, there's always the possibility that no one else has done any research on the taxa, and so none exist. (And indeed, I can't find any sources that don't have your name attached.) But, it's good to keep in mind when moving forward.

Anyway, good job on your first article! - UtherSRG (talk) 12:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Dasypoda radchenkoi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dasypoda radchenkoi.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)