Gzkefpro, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Gzkefpro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Smiles

edit

Gzkefpro (talk) 22:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

edit
  Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!

Signage edit complete

edit

Your Wikipedia signature edit was complete. Now you can do this without hassle. Happy Editing!|signed=~ Me. <font color="sky blue"'''Gzkefpro'''</font> (talk) 22:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Featured article, Good article

edit

Please do not add a Featured Article or Good article template to an article as you did here and here unless the article has actually been through the FA or GA process. See WP:Good article and WP:FA. If you added these tags elsewhere, please remove them. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 23:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stiefel Laboratories. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 01:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. You have been told not to add these templates to articles, yet you keep adding them. If you keep doing it despite all these warnings, it is going to be considered vandalism. Kolbasz (talk) 23:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Monsoon with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 11:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Belarusian language. Jim1138 (talk) 11:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from The Least 100sec, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Kolbasz (talk) 11:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Trouted

edit
 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: disruptive edits. <font color="sky blue"'''Gzkefpro'''</font> (talk) 10:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

fea missingno

edit

fea missingno. <font color="sky blue"'''Gzkefpro'''</font> (talk) 23:20, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

TypingZone ranking.

edit

Well I got, a 43.23 in the general ranking. <font color="sky blue"'''Gzkefpro'''</font> (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Beepa

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beepa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Acroterion (talk) 03:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Least 100sec

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Least 100sec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Pirates! Chaos In The Town!

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Pirates! Chaos In The Town! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NikolaiHo 21:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Pirates! Chaos In The Town!

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Pirates! Chaos In The Town! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 23:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from The Pirates! Chaos In The Town!, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. PamD 23:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries

edit

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kolbasz (talk) 23:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Davy Jones' Locker with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

A whalemeat for you.

edit

 


Yum! Delicious!

The whale you used to squish another Wikipedian has been sliced and served as Japanese sashimi.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that, just like the whale in the picture, you have overused your {{whale}}.

Oh YUM DELICIOUS. <font color="sky blue"'''Gzkefpro'''</font> (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Davey2010

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Davey2010 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Illegitimate RFA. See this edit.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mutsuhiko Izumi (May 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 13:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Neutrogena for animals

edit

Your Teahouse question was archived, but if you have a reliable source and can show that the information is important, it can go in the Neutrogena article. Maybe YOU can't put it there, but perhaps you can find someone.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Gzkefpro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply