HER KNIGHT

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, HER KNIGHT. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

@HER KNIGHT: I hope you are well. May I take the liberty of intruding on your valuable time and ask that you read WP:RGW? If you could atune your editing with the principles it indicates, that would be great. Many thanks in advance. Yours, ——SerialNumber54129 14:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Delete?

I see that you have not yet made an entry at that AfD. Change your mind, or still puzzled on how-to? Also, at Wikipedia, OK to disagree with other editors about content, but personal attacks and threats ("patu") are forbidden and can lead to being permanently blocked. David notMD (talk) 15:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

I am going to see if this works as a communication tool HER KNIGHT (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

If you want someone to see that you have responded on your Talk page, need to poke them Several ways. One is @David notMD: That will show at my top menu that I have a message. David notMD (talk) 16:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

At the AfD, your recommendation for Delete is still visible. However, your extended text and some back and forth with another editor have been moved to a collapsed text section. Still there if readers want to open it via "Show.". Expect an Administrator decision in 7-14 days. Again, its not a vote - Admin reads everything and decides. What I suggest you do at this time is find other articles that interest you, to edit. You can put the AfD on your Watch list, so that you can keep abreast of more comments and the final decision. David notMD (talk) 13:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Katelyn Nicole Davis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 00:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

You may not post hearsay, speculation or unsourced defamatory material about anybody anywhere on Wikipedia, including on my talkpage. If you continue to treat Wikipedia as a battleground for any purpose your editing privileges may be permanently removed. Acroterion (talk) 00:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

I see that the decision on the article was Delete. I hope that you can bring your enthusiasm to editing other articles while refraining from attacking editors who disagree with you, or from posting content that is either unsubstantiated or not germane to the articles in question. David notMD (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)