HJV

== Bit rate ==

Reply on Talk:Bit rate. – Smyth\^talk 1 July 2005 08:40 (UTC)

Turin

Replied to your message on my talk page, thanks. Andrwsc 00:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Lordin oikeat nimet

Lordin oikeat nimet löytyvät tiistain Ilta-Sanomista. Itse en lehteä ostanut enkä muista niitä ulkoa. Ehtii vielä kipaista ostamaan lehden, tai sitten huomenna sitä voi etsiä kirjastoista, kahviloista tai työpaikan kahvitilasta. JIP | Talk 17:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Eipä ole IS:ää, eikä ole vissiin saatavillakaan (en ole nyt Suomessa). Pitää kysellä jos jollain sattus olemaan tuo.. Kumma kyllä että yhtyeen kotisivulla tai fanisivuilla ei ole noita nimiä. Suomen wikipediasta löysin kuitenkin rumpalin nimen (alku se on sekin).--HJV 21:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Keskiviikkona IS meni julkaisemaan kaikkein aikojen ensimmäisen kuvan Toni Putaansuusta ilman maskia. Putaansuu oli ulkoiluttamassa koiraansa ja IS:n toimittaja sai sivukuvan jossa näkyy kasvot hupun alta. Lisäksi mukana oli piirros siitä miltä koko kasvot näyttäisivät ilman huppua. JIP | Talk 08:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Hello, Why did you ask me to stop vandalizing pages? Do you have evidence I did any such thing? IN the future, please provide specific examples if you feel I have abused any of the articles.

I think you are almost certainly confusing me with someone else as I've only done 1 or 2 minor edits in my entire Wikipedia experience ;)

Best regards from Vienna,

Scott

Scott, I suppose you do not have a registered nickname here, as you did not sign with it. It is likely that I put a vandalism warning on the talk page of an anonymous user (identified by his IP number). With some ISPs (Internet Service Providers), the IP numbers rotate, and it is possible that you now have an IP number that previously belonged to a vandal. I suggest registering a nick, which should stop you from getting false vandal warnings.--HJV 11:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Serbia

No problem. :) --Pockey 22:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

WW1

Hi,

I'm British myself. The reason I Americanised the spelling is that there was both British and American spelling in the article, I did this in the interest of consistency, which if I recall is not a violation of the rules, infact it's encouraged. If you want to change the spelling to British English, that's fine by me though. Jombo 15:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Lacrimas Profundere2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Kuva001.jpg. The copy called Image:Kuva001.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 04:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Regarding Moravcsik

Please see my response here. Thanks, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 04:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Criticisms of iPhone

Criticisms of the iPhone are definitely a good thing to include in the article and they are included. As a matter of fact, almost all of the criticisms that you added are already in the article. As an example, the lack of video and flash capability are included in the Others section with the rest of the camera information. Just because the article does not have a Criticism section does not mean it does not have criticisms at all. Criticisms are just interleaved with the rest of the article. --Bobblehead ^(rants) 19:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HJV. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Winter Olympics Locations.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Winter Olympics Locations.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lacrimas Profundere2.jpg

The file File:Lacrimas Profundere2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, low quality.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Knob

The article The Knob has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable indie band, tagged since 2009

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)