User talk:HJ Mitchell/Archive 120
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:HJ Mitchell. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 115 | ← | Archive 118 | Archive 119 | Archive 120 | Archive 121 | Archive 122 | → | Archive 125 |
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
Northampton War Memorial scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that Northampton War Memorial has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 11 November 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 11, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 21:58, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
?
Is everything OK? You haven't edited for a while which is unusual for you. Send me an email if you prefer. Chris. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Is everything OK?
Hi Harry. Apart from an isolated edit in May, this is the longest break you've taken. I hope all's well. Feel free to mail me. Chris. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC was closed with the consensus that the resysop criteria should be made stricter.
- The follow-up RfC to develop that change is now open at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2).
- A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors may now nominate themselves as candidates for the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections. The self-nomination period will close November 12, with voting running from November 19 through December 2.
TFA
Thank you today for Northampton War Memorial, introduced: "I've been working my way through Lutyens' war memorials for the best part of the last year and this is one of the articles I'm most proud of, and hopefully the first of several I'll be bringing here."! - Good timing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Harry, I would love you to nominate me as Admin
Your profile caught my interest. I feel that after several years editing here on Wikipedia, I would like to go to the next level of responsibility and decision-making privileges. I am passionate about history, languages, literature and wish to contribute more towards Wikipedia articles and editing in English and Portuguese. I read the RfA page, advice, successful and unsuccessful applicants and opted for requesting a nomination. This sounds like the most sensible, mature choice to me. The rest... well, what will be will be. Best regards from Cambridge, Melroross (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- (watching) @Melroross: Why not put yourself forward at WP:ORCP and get some different opinions? I think a lot of our suitable candidtates have been doing that recently. Good luck! ——SN54129 20:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Sadly, Harry hasn't edited in months ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda! I hadn't noticed that, I hope everything's ok 😔 🍻 ——SN54129 09:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
Administrator changes
EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
CheckUser changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
Technical news
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
Just an invitation to the blurb review. Enjoy your time off! - Dank (push to talk) 23:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm still alive!
Just in case anyone was worried about me (thank you especially to @Kudpung, WereSpielChequers, and RexxS: for checking up on me!), I'm still alive! Just busy in other areas of my life. I lost my enthusiasm for project space politics some time ago and focused on article writing, but that's not easy to fit around a family and a full-time job. I'll try and poke my head in a bit more frequently from now on and maybe potter about with some nice uncontroversial (and non-time-consuming!) admin tasks, but I'm not sure when (or if) I'll be as active as I used to be. In the meantime, you're welcome to contact me here, on Facebook, or a few of you have my mobile number. Also, thanks to @Carcharoth: for tending to some of my war memorial articles in my absence. If any of my stalkers feel like adding to my featured articles to their watchlists, I'd appreciate it. Now, someone catch me up on the drama I've missed? ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Glad to know you're OK, Harry ! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Glad as well. Just today I was reminded that we don't know the same for Mathsci. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Good to see you pop in HJ. Always nice to see good people around. — Ched (talk) 22:19, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Heh, yeah, glad to know absence if for good wholesome reasons than otherwise....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Nice to hear back. Glad all is well. There has been drama (maybe best avoided: portals, Fram, for starters)... Carcharoth (talk) 12:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Welcome back! As for drama, then WP:FRAMBAN is the biggest of the lot while Portals (case currently at Arbcom) is probably the most verbose dispute I've ever seen (seriously) but it can be summarised as some people really rather like portals, some people hate them with a passion and most of those in the middle got bullied out of the discussions. German War Effort and the related Antisemitism in Poland are still rumbling along as well - you should be aware of them if you're going to be doing anything related to WWII in Poland. Thryduulf (talk) 09:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thinking about you the other day as I came perilous close to Axminster and the Devon border, while doing my Remain bit in West Dorset. The M3 is not that bad providing you are travelling East. Wikidisputes? We can sort them out if we still have an internet after the 13th. ClemRutter (talk) 10:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @ClemRutter: if you ever find yourself so far west again, you must drop in for a cup of tea. North Devon has more to offer in the summer but it still has its charms in the winter. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:59, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thinking about you the other day as I came perilous close to Axminster and the Devon border, while doing my Remain bit in West Dorset. The M3 is not that bad providing you are travelling East. Wikidisputes? We can sort them out if we still have an internet after the 13th. ClemRutter (talk) 10:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi HJ, good to hear from you, glad you are being lured away rather than the reverse. by coincidence I was in Devon for a few minutes yesterday morning. Some photos taken in the Lyme Regis dinosaur museum will be uploaded at some point. ϢereSpielChequers 11:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Cheers
|
Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well HJM. MarnetteD|Talk 11:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
| A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | 
|
|
|
Io Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC) |
Merry thingy and happy whatnot
|
Hi Harry! All the warmest wishes for this seasonal occasion, whichever you celebrate - or don't, while I swelter at 27℃ (80.6℉), and peace and prosperity for 2020. I realise you're busy in RL, but hoping that you'll join me for a cool beer in Bangkok in August when it will be even hotter! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC) |
Be well at Christmas
|
Have a WikiChristmas and a PediaNewYear |
|
Be well. Keep well. Have a lovely Christmas. SilkTork (talk) 18:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC) |
Good luck
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはHJ Mitchellたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 03:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello HJ Mitchell: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 08:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
.jpg)
-
MMXX Lunar Calendar
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.
– 2020 is a leap year – news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
Arbitration
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
Miscellaneous
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
Request reduction of sanctions
See Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2015#Gun Control. I think I've been clean since then, except for possibly one or two instances of spam removal, and declining comment when asked. Oops, I forgot. Questioning whether a gun control rally was a suitable "event" for a year article, and (loosely relevant) questioning whether some student victims were suitable for deaths or births in year articles.
The only other sanctions still in effect against me, are a 1RR/week restriction on Tea Party. See User:Arthur Rubin#List of known editing restrictions. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- FYI, Arthur Rubin, please note that Harry hasn't edited in over a month. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- I know that. The rules say I have to ask here, first, before asking at WP:AE. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
- From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
- News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
- Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
- Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
- News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
- Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
- From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
Technical news
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
Arbitration
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon
Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, hope this will prove to be good fun and productive, we have over 44,000 stubs! You have a lot of contacts, please invite others you think will be interested!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Herbert Vivian
Hi Harry. I have been working on an article about the Herbert Vivian. He was a fascinating man, who moved in high circles in the years leading up to the First World War. He was a good friend of both Randolph and Winston Churchill, moved in Oscar Wilde's circle - and was directly responsible for the split between Wilde and Whistler - and was the private secretary of Wildfed Scawen Blunt. He was a passionate Jacobite and was instrumental in the Neo-Jacobite Revival of the 1890s. After the war, this monarchism turned to outright fascism, especially an admiration for Mussolini. He published several books, including works on Serbia which are still quoted, founded at least two newspapers, and was a prolific journalist. He is now largely forgotten, but his story weaves together many threads of late Victorian and inter-war British history.
The article passed GA a while ago, and I would like to submit it for FA consideration. This is my first attempt at an FA, and I would dearly love some feedback and mentoring. Given your interest in British history, I was hoping you would consider acting as my mentor? Many thanks for the consideration, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I hadn't realised you were less active these days. I will try to find another mentor to work with. Best, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 19:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear HJ Motchell
This user User:อัลเบิร์ is trying to make an edit war and I explain about the Wikipedia policy to him but I argue to block anyone who blames to edit in content that this user only thinks he is true. No one can edit on the page that the user was overseer. I need you to tell him to understand the rule and don't make another misunderstanding in Wikipedia rule, especially I need you to BLOCK him to resolve the problem that this user make.
Thank You Ministerboy (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Excuse me but are you, Ministerboy, the IP that are constantly making reverts on those pages? If you are, I believe that you are the one that are violating the rules and try to put your faults into the other's hand. The other user is asking for a discuss with you but you don't do it. Your version of edits cannot be accepted because it came later and the other user is not consenting with you. So you have to discuss first but you choose not to do it and instead, committed warring edit violation. อัลเบิร์ (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Dear User:อัลเบิร์ That another IP is my friend that sits behind me, I work for Wikipedia Thai football for 4 Year and I was work for Thai FA for 2 years until now. Why you delete the honor content of every Thai team and why you delete the history of every Thai team. All the information I find with my ability with my Wikipedia user friend for 4 year and you came here to delete and tell me to talk with you first. That was absurd and can't accept. STOP doing this action for the better way of finding the information from Wikipedia. Ministerboy (talk) 05:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- As info, I blocked all 3 users for 24 hours for edit warring. Didn't realize Ministerboy had left this same message to 6-7 others. -- ferret (talk) 14:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
March Madness 2020
G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
Technical news
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
I take a bet with you that after three days the troll will be back at it again!! Govvy (talk) 17:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- That's fine, but part of Wikipedia being a wiki is that it's openly editable (as far as possible), so we use page protection sparingly. If the problems resurface on Friday, it's easy to enough to re-apply the protection. Just ask me here or go back to RfPP. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Welcome back
Long time no see. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks mate! Always a pleasure to see you around. Alas, real life keeps me busy but I'm trying to get back into WP, or at least check my watchlist every couple of days but I'm having to borrow the mrs' laptop at the moment. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Harry, Good to see you around again, hope all is well. If you are still into grade II listed war memorials, I took some photos of this one. ϢereSpielChequers 17:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- @WereSpielChequers: Thanks! Long time no see! I must get up to London soon. I like war memorials of all shapes and sizes but my focus is still Lutyens and related memorials. Congratulations on your elevation to sainthood, btw! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Welcome back. Harry, my spam folder has 3 emails that claim they're from you, from early February to 2 March, that are probably malware links to sites in Russia and Grenada. It could easily be someone spoofing your email, or you might have an infected machine. - Dank (push to talk) 02:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Dan, I'm pretty sure its someone spoofing my address—Doug Weller mentioned receiving something similar but there's nothing like that in my sent folder. It wouldn't be the first time. It seems to happen every now and then. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Harry, that's a more religious analogy than I'm entirely comfortable with, but I shall see if my halo can be pressed into service as a frisbee. Ping me when you are next coming to see us in London. ϢereSpielChequers 10:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- @WereSpielChequers: I might need to dispatch someone to the National Archives to help with an article in the near future (depending on how much it'll cost for them to send me a copy vs someone going in person). Would you be up for a trip to Kew? :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Harry, quite possibly, email me details in a week or so if you need me. ϢereSpielChequers 10:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @WereSpielChequers: I might need to dispatch someone to the National Archives to help with an article in the near future (depending on how much it'll cost for them to send me a copy vs someone going in person). Would you be up for a trip to Kew? :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Welcome back. Harry, my spam folder has 3 emails that claim they're from you, from early February to 2 March, that are probably malware links to sites in Russia and Grenada. It could easily be someone spoofing your email, or you might have an infected machine. - Dank (push to talk) 02:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Good to know you are back, I was getting worried for a while. I'm just cleaning up for my departure from Wikipedia, but if Wikimania goes ahead in BKK I'll be there to say a few real farewells despite what looked like attempts at Arbcom to ban me from the conference. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ran into a page you just protected and thought, "Harry's back!" Hope spotting your work is a regular occurrence. Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Can you revdel this [2]? Thanks. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't feel that comes close to meeting the criteria for revdel. Note that the criterion is "grossly offensive, insulting, or degrading" (my emphasis), not just anything rude and unpleasant. In general, it's a principle of Wikipedia that we keep everything (even junk) unless it absolutely has to go because it causes harm. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Widen your rangeblock?
Hello HJ. Please see this post at AIV today complaining about 116.206.40.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). You previously created a one-week rangeblock of Special:Contributions/116.206.40.96/27 to deal with this possible Alex Neman sock, but it appears that the block might have to widen to /24 to deal with it. For example a block of Special:Contributions/116.206.40.0/24 might be needed. I just blocked the single IP that was reported. My own review of the /24 suggests that it might be blocked for a long time without losing any useful contributions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ed. I usually start with a range narrow enough to capture all the IPs I know about and then widen from there if the problems persist. I had a look and you're right; we probably wouldn't be losing anything of value from a block of the wider range, so I've blocked 116.206.40.0/24 for a month. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. Regarding this RfP close...how about now? Those are all new since I requested protection. This anon has done this 5 times this month, some 15 or so times over the past year. I'm quite tired of reverting this single-purpose disruptor. As you noted, the edits are persistent. What can be done? The IPs are all from the same range: 2601:648:8701:2c0:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx. Might some sort of range block help? --IllaZilla (talk) 14:57, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @IllaZilla: I've blocked 2601:648:8701:2c0::/64 for a month. That probably won't solve all your problems because it doesn't capture every IP they've used (I can't really do that without blocking half the Internet, and the software won't let me do that anyway), but hopefully it'll make it a little bit more difficult for them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, hopefully that will provide some relief. --IllaZilla (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC)