HW-lied

• Hello World!:-)

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from History of the Luftwaffe (1933–1945). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. XXX antiuser ^eh? 18:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to History of the Luftwaffe (1933–1945), you will be blocked from editing. XXX antiuser ^eh? 18:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Stop your bullshit comments. I removed a photoshop made image which was totally stupid. Even a child can notice that the image is not genuine. The text supported by the fake image is also not reliable.--HW-lied (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to History of the Luftwaffe (1933–1945), you will be blocked from editing. XXX antiuser ^eh? 18:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

What is the source for this image? You are vandalizing the page by inserting children's drawing as a historical image into the article --HW-lied (talk) 18:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

The source is clearly stated at the image's page, which you have wrongfully tagged for speedy deletion, by the way. XXX antiuser ^eh? 18:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

The source is fake. DO you have any proof for the source and from where did they find this image?HW-lied (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

How is it fake? What's your proof for it being fake? I didn't upload it - but you seem to have an agenda here. XXX antiuser ^eh? 18:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Even a child can notice it is fake. Nothing is natural in the picture. Heads and hands of the people are clearly placed on the bodies with an image manipulating software. It is the worst example of Photoshop made images.HW-lied (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

It's just a low-quality image, as many WWII-era images are. Doesn't seem to be fake and the source seems legit. I work with Photoshop day in and day out, so if it was blatant I would know. XXX antiuser ^eh? 19:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You should clearly work more then! Even a beginner can notice it is totally fake.HW-lied (talk) 19:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm not going to bother arguing this with you anymore. The image has obviously passed community consensus and is included in multiple articles about the Holocaust. I have added you to WP:AIV as your persistent removal of valid content from articles constitutes vandalism. XXX antiuser ^eh? 19:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You are clearly doing it with an agenda. Where is the community consensus? Where is the proof that the image is genuine?--HW-lied (talk) 19:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Look at the image page. "Taken from: Hanauske-Abel, Hartmut M. "Not a Slippery Slope or Sudden Subversion: German Medicine and National Socialism in 1933." BMJ: British Medical Journal 313(7070): 1453-1463. 7 December 1996.". XXX antiuser ^eh? 19:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Every body can claim anything, including the image is a property of the US government etc... Where is the proof? Even if that Journal has published the image, where did they get the image? Serious questions!HW-lied (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of the Luftwaffe (1933–1945). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Momo san ^Gespräch 19:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You can't bring proof for the image and instead you threaten people. Very funny.HW-lied (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked. The block reason is: "Disruptive POV-pushing SPA, apparent nazi apologist agenda, offensive nazi-themed username". Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

What the fuck is "apparent nazi apologist agenda, offensive nazi-themed username" all about? You can't provide proof for that picture and you ban people to push your stupid claims forward.HW-lied (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

We can. It was published by the BMJ, which is an extremely reliable source. That you said that it was a photoshopped image on File talk:Dachau cold water immersion.jpg has no proof whatsoever. I endorse this block. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 00:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)