Hadiyana
Copy and paste moves
editPlease, don't copy and paste to move an article, it's against guidelines. When you copy and paste move an article it breaks that article's history and the history needs to be kept for licensing issues. Read WP:MOVE and WP:CPM and restore the ones you've done already. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 08:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your enlightment.
Sunda Kingdom and Sunda kingdom
editDear, I would like to inform you that I am a user who write Sunda kingdom for the first time. I am of an opinion that the tittle must be capitalized, thus I copy the content of "Sunda kingdom" to page "Sunda Kingdom" and redirect the old page to the new one. The content is the same so I think there is no promblem at all.
Sincerely, --Hadiyana (talk) 09:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- The problem is not with your intention. The "K" in kingdom should be capitalized. The problem is in your copying and pasting. Which is not how you move a page and creates issues with the license whenever you do it. The "K" article needs to be deleted temporarily to move the "k" article over the proper way. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 09:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- So, would you mind to help me to fix the problem to capitalize the title. Thank you in advance for your kind assistance.--Hadiyana (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- The deletion template will get an Admin to come around and do it for us, since I can't do it myself. I'll add it to the Galuh article as well.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 09:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. But how long? And, you are an admin but why could't you do it?--Hadiyana (talk) 09:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I'd like to be, but I'm not an Admin. And unfortunately it can take awhile. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 09:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- What if deletting the page K by ourselves and then moving the page k by using "move" button in the editing window? Is it possible to do that? --Hadiyana (talk) 09:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Naw, that doesn't work. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 09:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll wait for admins to delete the K pages. Thank you for enlighting discussion. --Hadiyana (talk) 09:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Categories...
editMay I offer some quick advice on categories? ‘hope you don't mind. An article should not be listed under both a category and a sub-category. Take Indonesian National Revolution for example. This has the category “:Category:Indonesian National Revolution” which is a sub category of “:Category:History of Indonesia” and thus it doesn’t need to be repeated under this one. Thus, if a reader clicks on “:Category:History of Indonesia” there shouldn’t be a list of dozens of articles, rather a list of sub-categories – as it is now. This is why I removed ‘Cultural Heritage” from Luso Sundanese padrão [1] - ie, Monuments and memorials is already part of it “Cultural Heritage”. There's a few more of yours that might fix - just look out for what I do, and it should be clear. regards. --Merbabu (talk) 03:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, regrads, --Hadiyana (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Section headings
editPlease do not remove. Tak bisa. Mungkin kalau bisa - kurang mengerti atau faham bagaimana wikipedia works - please do not move SatuSuro 13:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sundanese_people&oldid=210971171 - suggests that you do not know how wikipedia works - maybe you would best help at wikipedia Indonesia - disini meganggu sekali! 13:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Kesalahan besar! Deleting the title of the article because it is not suitable. To see Sunda history, see Sunda Kingdom page.
That is wrong - it is a section heading (not an article - there is a difference) and it needs to stay there.
Please do not move section headings.
If you think it relates (berhubungan) you add a link/connection - you do not remove - itu yang faham aneh!
What you should have done if you though there was a connection - is that you place a comment under that title: - See also: - to the other article. SatuSuro 13:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not
editCreate links to innapropriate articles - Sunda Kingdom was a historical state - it is not current and should not be referred to in current information articles SatuSuro 11:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
editPlease do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Sunda Straight. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, READ WP:SOCK very very very carefully, as you will find yourself blocked if you do that again SatuSuro 07:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- I am of an opinion that what hadiyana had done is right; he tried to make wikipedia information concerning Indonesia and Sunda clearer. I am also in an opinion that you had mislead and misinformed us. I am, as a non Indonesian, get confused with what you have written or edited after I read many references. It seems to me that you are very Java centric and tried to conduct ethnocide to other tribes in Indonesia by your wiriting or edit in Wikipedia. If you do it again I will take you (SatuSuro) to Wikipedia. --Naruto kobayashi (talk) 01:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- It seems to me that you also tried to terorized other very contributive wikipedia user. It is very destructive. I will take it to Wikipedia if you do it again. --Naruto kobayashi (talk) 01:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your repeated accusations that SatuSuro has been terrorising other users were brought to my attention as an administrator on the English Wikipedia and I have spent considerable time looking carefully through numerous edits made to multiple pages and I cannot find any wrong doing on SatuSuro's behalf so I must ask you to cease making baseless accusations without providing evidence. This is very serious on the English Wikipedia and if you continue accusing him of wrong doing without providing links as evidence, such as accusing him of terrorism and of trying "to conduct ethnocide to other tribes in Indonesia by your wiriting or edit in Wikipedia", two highly, highly, offensive, defamatory and serious accusations, your account may be blocked. I can see that there are some English problems and communications issues here but you cannot go around accusing people of terrorism and "ethnocide" and I must insist that you now cease and desist these unfounded accusations. If you wish to pursue a complaint against another editor, you must provide evidence in the form of diffs. If you are unsure how to provide diffs, then please ask for help and I will assist you but these unfounded and unsupported accusations must stop now. Sarah 03:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- It seems to me that you also tried to terorized other very contributive wikipedia user. It is very destructive. I will take it to Wikipedia if you do it again. --Naruto kobayashi (talk) 01:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Ask admins' help to move me out from english wikipedia
editDear admins,
Please move me out from english wikipedia.
Thank you
- I'm not sure what "move me out" means but I've attempted to oblige with a block on this account for your abusive and blatantly transparent sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry and the repeated bad faith accusations, after warnings, that SatuSuro is engaging in terrorism and stalking, which was caped off by this edit [2], now reverted. Your sock farm will be blocked in the morning. Thanks, Sarah 15:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear admins,
Help me, I want my account to be deleted from english wikipedia.
Thank you.
- We don't delete accounts on Wikipedia. There is no function that allows us to do this. If you want to leave Wikipedia then just stop coming here. You may edit again once your block has expired if you want to but resuming edit warring and POV-pushing will result in longer blocks. Your abusive sockpuppets will be blocked indefinitely. I personally do not wish you to leave and I would prefer you come back when your block expires and edit within the English Wikipedia's policies and guidelines but if you are unable or unwilling to do so then that's okay, too. But still, we have no ability to delete accounts so you will just have to stop using your accounts if you no longer want them. Thanks, Sarah 02:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Mengerti?
editTak bisa 'move out' - harus berhenti saja - itu cukup - - sesudah itu disini kosong, dan sesudah block kalau kembali dan kerja dengan kondisi WP EN - bisa - tetapi tak bisa 'delete' - kalau tak mahu kembali atau menulis disini - berhenti saja - itu cukup - tak harus tolong admin untuk tutup disini. Awas hati hati dengan kata kata tentang merbabu dan saya - bisa dapat permanent block kalau coba kat kata sekali lagi - kalau kurang faham tentang WP EN jangan dapat kata kata keras dan kurang sopan seperti sampai sekarang - atau mungkin membuat persoalan lebih besar untuk semua berhubung dengan hadiyana dan kata kata nakal - admin kurang suka editors nakal dan bisa memeriksa bagaimana dengan accounts lagi - dan semua blocked. SatuSuro 03:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
{{Sockpuppeteer|blocked}}
Deo Volente
editDear Mr. Mikhailov Kusserow, I am really happy to know from you that it is possible to reactivate my en account. I really want to have my en account active. If you do not mind, I ask your help to realize my wish. Thank you in advance for your kind help. Sincerely, --Hadiyana (talk) 09:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Please tell us, what account do you want to use? Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Dear Mr. Mikhilov,
- Thank you for your kind assistance.
- If you don't mind, I would like to have account "hadiyana" to use en wikipedia.
- Best regards, --Hadiyana (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- As your blocking administrator, if you wish for your account to be unblocked or to be allowed to use a different account, you are going to have to deal with the issues that led to your block in the first place. Please be aware that using another account while this one is blocked is a violation of policy which will get you in even more trouble so I don't recommend you create another account. You were blocked because you were editing in a very disruptive manner, creating hoax articles, blatant sockpuppetry, engaging in original research and making very offensive accusations against other editors. A year has passed since then so I would entertain the idea of giving you a second chance, but we would need to see that you understand why you were blocked and won't do those things again and that you are now willing to follow the English Wikipedia rules. If you were to be unblocked, any repeated problematic behaviour would result in your account being immediately reblocked. Sarah 01:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Dear Sarah, as you can see I have not use another account while this one is blocked thus I didn't create another account as you recommend. For your reference, I also contribute so many articles in id and su wikipedias using this account without any problems. I thank you very much if you release the block because I want to contribute articles concerning my ethnic. --Hadiyana (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Found this on Xeno's talk page. I'm not totally sure about policies in this case, but does contributing well in another language Wikipedia automatically mean you'll contribute well to one that, to you, seems to be a foreign language (as this version of your old English Wikipedia user page shows)? I know that, if I was to suddenly go berserk and want to vandalise (which I won't), I'd go for a language that I understood, but not my main language, so that I wasn't blocked on it when I returned to normality and contributed nicely again. What were your edits on the Bahasa Indonesia and Basa Sunda like at the time you were sockpuppeting and being disruptive here? However, a year has passed and I wasn't around at the time, so while my opinion counts for naught, I would also be in favour of a second chance, possibly on the short leash of probation depending on how bad you were (provided anyone can read the Bahasa Indonesia or Basa Sunda to see what your current edits there are like). --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 10:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Dear Sarah, as you can see I have not use another account while this one is blocked thus I didn't create another account as you recommend. For your reference, I also contribute so many articles in id and su wikipedias using this account without any problems. I thank you very much if you release the block because I want to contribute articles concerning my ethnic. --Hadiyana (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Dear Thejadefalcon,
- I edited articles related to Sundanese history and culture in three languages, they were basa Sunda, Bahasa Indonesia, and English. I translated my articles in Basa Sunda and Bahasa Indonesia into English.
- Thank you for your support. --Hadiyana (talk) 06:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Dear xeno, Mr. Mikhilov, Sarah, and Thejadefalcon,
- Thank you very very much for your kindness. I will be very careful in editing articles.
- Best regards, --Hadiyana (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 10:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
It seems that many of the references you've provided in the Gunung Padang article are either deadlinks or don't support the information. Can you provide additional sources? Thanks! PDCook (talk) 16:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- Dear Pdcook,
- Thank you for your kind correction.
- I've just fixed 1 dead link and deleted 1 another dead link.
- Regards, --Hadiyana (talk) 03:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tarimerak.jpg
editA tag has been placed on File:Tarimerak.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wayanggolek.jpg
editA tag has been placed on File:Wayanggolek.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Dear IngerAlHaosului,
- The picture is belong to me (Hadiyana). I put it on my web (http://members.tripod.com/Hadiyana/sundaculture.htm) several years ago. I declare that the picture is free to be used by anyone.
- Thank you, --Hadiyana (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Pakuan Pajajaran
editDear Hadiyana,
Could you load your map of Pakuan (File:Pakuanpajajaran.jpg) to Wikimedia Commons so that I could use it in my article about Bogor in Russian Wikipedia? At the moment it is already by far the largest article on Bogor in Wikipedia but it would look much better with such a great map.
Thank you in advance,
Bapak Alex (talk) 12:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Dear bapak Alex,
- the map has been in Wikimedia Commons (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pakuanpajajaran.jpg). You can use it in your article.
- Best regards, --Hadiyana (talk) 03:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Dear Hadiyana,
Please, accept my belated gratitude for your kind assistance in using the great map of Pakuan in my article about Bogor. Last month my “Bogor” was elected a featured article of Russian Wikipedia - part of the fame is yours!:). Recently it was translated in English so you can read it here: the translation is good, just slightly abridged in some places.
Finest regards, Bapak Alex (talk) 15:38, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:WidiMulia.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:WidiMulia.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
editYour upload of File:Cangkuangtemple.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Sunda Indonesia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Orang Banten.jpg
editThank you for uploading File:Orang Banten.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)