Hainotdeptrai
Speedy deletion nomination of Christopher Nguyen
editHello Hainotdeptrai,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Christopher Nguyen for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.
If you don't want Christopher Nguyen to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
CS1 error on 2023 Hanoi building fire
editHello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Hanoi building fire, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Signatures in footballer infoboxes and copyrighted images
editGreetings! Your recent edits to several pages of football players have been reverted. To see what such an infobox should include, take a look at this page.
Additionally, uploading and using images that are copyrighted is strictly forbidden without specific permission from the image owner. You can read more about the topic here. Regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 12:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- All photos are reproduced by me Hainotdeptrai (talk) 12:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- added with work from Vietnamese wikipedia Hainotdeptrai (talk) 12:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- And there are photos I took myself Hainotdeptrai (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Strange, considering there are identical images available on multiple large media websites, such as talkSPORT and Manchester Evening News. Are you the one who they got the images from? Vasil3fonov (talk) 13:16, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- can also be said to be like that Hainotdeptrai (talk) 14:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- The signature I remade myself based on online signatures using Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop Hainotdeptrai (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- The signatures are fine, they are just not supposed to be used in pages about football players. The copyrighted images, though, are taken from Getty images, as far as I can see, and such are not able to be used on Wikipedia. I feel like I am not competent enough on this issue, so I will ask for some assistance from an admin. Vasil3fonov (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Can player images be cropped from original images? Hainotdeptrai (talk) 15:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well that is essentially the same image, so the copyright still stands. You should either have taken the image yourself, or you should have obtained permission to use it. Vasil3fonov (talk) 17:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oke Hainotdeptrai (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- If you did not take the image yourself with your camera, you cannot claim it as your own personal work. You cannot simply take any random images from the internet, you must have evidence that the copyright of the image permits its use on Wikipedia. If the image has no specific copyright displayed, you must assume that you cannot use it here. You must immediately request deletion of the images you are falsely claimning are your own personal work. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oke Hainotdeptrai (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well that is essentially the same image, so the copyright still stands. You should either have taken the image yourself, or you should have obtained permission to use it. Vasil3fonov (talk) 17:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Can player images be cropped from original images? Hainotdeptrai (talk) 15:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- The signatures are fine, they are just not supposed to be used in pages about football players. The copyrighted images, though, are taken from Getty images, as far as I can see, and such are not able to be used on Wikipedia. I feel like I am not competent enough on this issue, so I will ask for some assistance from an admin. Vasil3fonov (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Strange, considering there are identical images available on multiple large media websites, such as talkSPORT and Manchester Evening News. Are you the one who they got the images from? Vasil3fonov (talk) 13:16, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lee Min-a, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Kylecolona in hanoifc.jpeg
editThanks for uploading File:Kylecolona in hanoifc.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- I applied for the club's copyright for non-commercial purposes and they agreed Hainotdeptrai (talk) 02:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kylecolona in hanoifc.jpeg
editThanks for uploading File:Kylecolona in hanoifc.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Nguyễn Sỹ Đức
editHello Hainotdeptrai, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nguyễn Sỹ Đức, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyễn Sỹ Đức.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Miminity}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 6
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Telles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luís Castro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 14
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Can Uzun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DFB.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 22
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Luciano Acosta
- added links pointing to Diario Clarín and Godoy Cruz
- Sven Botman
- added a link pointing to Ajax
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 29
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Luciano Acosta
- added a link pointing to Godoy Cruz
- Maarten Paes
- added a link pointing to PSV
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
editPlease do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Mees Hilgers. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. WP:COMPETENCE in written English is required to edit properly in the English-language Wikipedia. Your recent edits suggest that you lack proper competence in that language. Anwegmann (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Wesley Saïd , you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Anwegmann (talk) 19:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
editPlease note that seasons that happened in specific years ARE NOT listed as "season 2020/21". Instead, they are listed as "2020–21 season". Anwegmann (talk) 19:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)