Your submission at Articles for creation: Afronitaaa (May 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 00:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hakeem Baidoo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liancetalk 00:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabbie Odonkor (May 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 00:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabbie Odonkor (May 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 00:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Afronitaaa

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Afronitaaa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TornadoLGS (talk) 00:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gabbie Odonkor

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Gabbie Odonkor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabbie Odonkor

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gabbie Odonkor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hakeem Baidoo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

Note that your initial statement should replace the words "your reason here" in your request. As you say you are going to take time to read about some relevant guidelines, we'll close this request so you can do that and then make a new request where you demonstrate your understanding of those guidelines. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Seraphimblade,
I recently received a block on my account due to concerns about advertising or promotion. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and ensuring that content remains neutral and encyclopedic.
Upon reflection, I realize that my previous edits may have inadvertently appeared promotional in nature. However, I want to assure you that it was not my intention to promote any particular entity or individual.
I am committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia by providing accurate and unbiased information. I have reviewed Wikipedia's guidelines and am prepared to make the necessary adjustments to ensure that my contributions meet the community's standards.
I respectfully request that you consider lifting the block on my account so that I may continue to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Hakeem Baidoo Hakeem Baidoo (talk) 02:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


Dear Seraphimblade, I recently received a block on my account due to concerns about advertising or promotion. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and ensuring that content remains neutral and encyclopedic.

Upon reflection, I realize that my previous edits may have inadvertently appeared promotional in nature. However, I want to assure you that it was not my intention to promote any particular entity or individual.

I am committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia by providing accurate and unbiased information. I have reviewed Wikipedia's guidelines and am prepared to make the necessary adjustments to ensure that my contributions meet the community's standards.

I respectfully request that you consider lifting the block on my account so that I may continue to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, Hakeem Baidoo

I will discuss the block with you, but not with a bot. If you'd like to discuss it, please do so in your own words and without use of chatbots. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi Seraphimblade,
I noticed my recent edits have lead to me being blocked. I plead will henceforth adhere to the Wikipedia guidelines in any of my forth coming edits.
I humble request you consider lifting the block on my account. Thank you for considering Hakeem Baidoo (talk) 02:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
What do you think it is about your recent edits that led to that, and what would you plan to do differently if unblocked? Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
My next plan is to study the guidelines properly. Before any to do anything on Wikipedia Hakeem Baidoo (talk) 02:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
That sounds like a good idea, but you don't need to be unblocked to do that. You might start with those on neutrality, reliable sources, and notability. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure Hakeem Baidoo (talk) 02:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


Hello, Hakeem Baidoo. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created  Nasir Children Training Centre has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Persistent posters of promotional content may be blocked from editing.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nasir Children Training Centre

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nasir Children Training Centre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  // Timothy :: talk  03:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply