Hamptou

Prada case

Hello Hamptou welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edits to Prada gender discrimination case had several problems:

• Your comments are POV slanting the article to one side.
• CASE 3 and CASE 4 are duplications.
• Your claim that “Prada Group admitted to sexual harassment is not supported by the reference.
• Judgement Without Law is only a claim by the plaintiff.
• “Sexual harassment and discrimination is confirmed,” is not supported by reference.
• “secret taped “ bad grammar.
• “…calling her personal mobile phone, convinced to settle the case …” bad grammar.
• “The same incident happened to two former managers” is merely an unsupported claim by the plainiff.
• The use of celebrities unconnected to the case is meaningless – plus the sentence implies they are U.N. ambassadors.

Let’s work on the talk page to make the article more neutral and improve grammar. Cheers.Grahamboat (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)