Handyunits

Noticed your input on user Antiochus the Great for being unconstructive on edits

I read your comments on User:Antiochus the Great talkpage for interfearing with unconstructive edits on the Indian Arms Forces to say I couldn't agree with you more. This user apparently has choosen to elminate key sources off the superpowers and potential superpowers pages on short notice. If you wish to make a report on this user on a complaint if you would like to view his history User:Antiochus the Great there is a place you can commment here[1] or if you think he edited the article you were working on was unconstructive that adminstrators should be concerned with unconstructive edits on articles such as the Indian Arms Forces. India is a key player on the world stage and it is good to protect that article than to wipe it out as User:Antiochus the Great has been doing. Any key suggestions on history if you think needs to be reported, please forward to me and I will see it will gets to the right adminstrator on User:Antiochus the Great unconstructive edits actions. Thanks (talk)

November 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Template:Islamism in South Asia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is your final warning! Your such edits have already been discussed in WP:ANI. If you continue to put WP:OR to the template then i've to reopen the archived discussion at WP:ANI. Please, refrain from making such edits. Benfold (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Template:Islamism in South Asia, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Benfold (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

• I strongly suggest that you do not add those events to Template:Islamism in South Asia again. If you think they should be in the template, discuss the matter at Template talk:Islamism in South Asia; if consensus emerges to include them, one of the other editors will gladly add them for you. Also, make sure you present reliable sources in your talk page discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Thanks, yes, I have seen, a lot of these articles have very off topic or incoherent information. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)