HarlanMonteEnbysk

This is HarlanMonteEnbysk's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: CompuCom Systems Inc. (March 3)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment they left was:

Like an advertise, most refs are from the company itself. Need secondary or thirdary refs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CompuCom Systems Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 08:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello! HarlanMonteEnbysk, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333 -blue 08:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: CompuCom Systems Inc. (April 7)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CompuCom Systems Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 13:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: CompuCom Systems Inc. (May 7)

Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CompuCom Systems Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I have rewritten "CompuCom Systems Inc.," at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:CompuCom_Systems_Inc. after doing numerous interviews, and would like to resubmit it to Wikipedia editors for review.

Thank you, Harlan Monte Enbysk

HarlanMonteEnbysk (talk) 17:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)October 13, 2016 HarlanMonteEnbysk (talk) 17:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC) forgot to include this yesterday. Thanks.Reply

HarlanMonteEnbysk (talk) 22:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)From User:HarlanMonteEnbyskReply

User:Anthony Appleyard, can you tell me more about why you think the Draft:CompuCom Systems Inc. page was simply advertising? Any tips to make it publishable? Thanks.

HarlanMonteEnbysk (talk) 22:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)HarlanMonteEnbyskReply

At 05:17, 29 October 2016 User:SwisterTwister tagged it {{Db-G11}} "Closely paraphrasing company's own webpages and information". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hey User:Anthony Appleyard, can we start "Draft:CompuCom Systems Inc." again, with a different approach? I wanted to get your OK before trying again. Thanks. HarlanMonteEnbysk (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)HarlanMonteEnbyskReply

@HarlanMonteEnbysk: The article CompuCom Systems Inc. has been twice (07:04, 2 September 2016 and 09:35, 29 October 2016) speedy-deleted as "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". At 05:17, 29 October 2016 SwisterTwister speedy-delete-tagged it with edit comment "Closely paraphrasing company's own webpages and information". See WP:NN; unless it can be proved that CompuCom Systems Inc. is noteworthy among the very many computer-related firms existing now. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:Anthony Appleyard, thanks for your quick response here. I will work on this and get back to you with proof. Thanks. HarlanMonteEnbysk (talk) 23:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)HarlanMonteEnbyskReply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]