Haroldholzer
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Harold Holzer, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/aboutus/advertising/radiospot/2005/050321_holzer_bio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
edit
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Harold Holzer. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
I have just reverted your blanking of this talk page. While it is OK for editors in most cases to blank their own talk pages, article talk pages should not be blanked unless it is for the purpose of archiving content to a subpage. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 20:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)