Hasek is the best

barnstar

Maybe you ever want a cool, and mean-looking barnstar? Well, if that's the case, this is real eye candy for you. You got it and you can give it to anyone who fight against vandals. Have a fun day 1() 20:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

FL Main page proposal

You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination recently. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual content will resemble the current content at the featured content page. Such output would probably start at the bottom of the main page. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

LOTD proposal

You have nominated a recently successful WP:FL. There have been two recent proposals to begin a List of the Day feature on the main page, which have both received majorities but have not been approved as overwhelming support sufficient to change the main page. WP:LOTDP is a new proposal to try to get the ball rolling based on the original proposal. You can voice your thoughts on its talk page. Basically, what the proposal entails is attempting to run an official trial, and then vote after the trial run on whether to change the main page. Support to run a trial requires much less consensus than support to change the main page. Should we succeed at eventually getting such a feature on the main page it would tentatively look like this. Whether or not you support an experimental trial or not you should come discuss the matter at WP:LOTDP's talk page. I apologize if you have either already voiced your opinion on this matter or already tired of hearing about it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Featured List of the Day Experiment

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 17:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

CASH line

The CASH line article is proposed for deletion. Please contribute to the discussion on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey talk page. Alaney2k (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Your username

Shouldn't you change it to User:Osgood is the best? Just kidding....I'll settle for "They are both the best" even though Osgood really is the best. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Ha, well, is he really going to retire this year? - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Hyperbowl

Hey there, I'm trying to improve the Hyperbowl article. I saw that you had created the article and wanted to know if you could provide any feedback; I'm trying to clean it up, make it read more like a Wikipedia article should. Problem is, I've only played it in the arcade, and I've never played the home version. Unless I can find notability to create two articles (doubtful) I'll be putting more info in on both versions as I find it. If you have any comments on how it turns out, or if you've played the home version, I'd appreciate the insight, as I'm currently trying to track down a copy. Thanks! Coreycubed (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Stats formatting

Hey, I noticed you were indenting "same year" stats within tables. I don't think this follows the manual of style (actually I don't think it's specified). What I've always done is made same-year statistics have the same background colour - it tends to look neater.-Wafulz (talk) 17:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out that discussion. I'll have a read through it.-Wafulz (talk) 20:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Ice Hockey March 2008 Newsletter

WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter Dear Hasek is the best! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been many more new things going on at WP:HOCKEY; this newsletter will be sent every two weeks/months. If you wish to not receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the newsletter mailing list. Thanks! New recognized content By The Pancake of Heaven! There has been numerous new recognized content, so much that it's too time-consuming to sift through the "trophy cases" on WP:HOCKEY. Some interesting achievements: 2016 NHL Draft has been newly created and has immediately become a GA status article. The Vancouver Canucks task force has become active again, thanks to Canuckian89! J.D. Watt has been declined at WP:AFD. Drafts related to the OHL have been published! Task forces By The Pancake of Heaven! We are working to create a new task force within the WikiProject to deal with topics related to the Pittsburgh Penguins. It hasn't been created yet; but it aims to expand articles based on former and current Pittsburgh Penguins players and articles. Good luck! New Administrators Currently 0 promoted admins! Be the first one at WP:RFA. Featured Topic Drive By Maxim The original featured topic drive, initiated by Scorpion0422, has concluded succesfully. National Hockey League awards is now a featured topic, with 24 articles in total. Of them, 20 are featured lists, one is a featured article, and the other three are trophy articles that were too short to become featured lists. Eight users signed up to help out, shown here. The next Featured Topic hasn't been decided upon, and the ideas and organization for it fell apart. If you have any ideas, don't hesitate to share them at WT:HOCKEY. Notes More editors are needed to help out with the newsletter. The newsletter creator doesn't have an infinite nor perfect supply of ideas, and thus he might omit some interesting news. Portal:Ice hockey is being considered for featured status. Should Chris Pronger have been suspended for more than eight games for stomping on Ryan Kesler? Vote here! Help Patrik Stefan -- one of the greatest NHL draft busts -- become a GA status article.

Note: You have received this because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. MonoBot (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Template:Jackie Chan filmography

Hi, I noticed you created this template. Just to let you know, it will probably end up getting deleted. I worked on similar templates a while ago, entitled "Jackie Chan films" (and "Sammo Hung films"), but they were both removed early this year - they ended up on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion, and were subsequently deleted on consensus along with several others such as "Fred Astaire films". Basically, filmographies are encouraged instead of actor-specific templates like the one you created. Gram123 (talk) 18:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

• Hi again, just found the discussion about the deletion of such templates, if you want to take a look: Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 January 16. Gram123 (talk) 10:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

RE - the above. I've now listed it at the following link - AFD for Jackie Chan films. Lugnuts (talk) 09:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

You can always add a "See also" section to each page, and add a link back to the main filmography. This will do two things i) link all the films and ii) not leave the filmography page orphaned. Lugnuts (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Puzz3DEiffeltower.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Puzz3DEiffeltower.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 04:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Senatorsupdate.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Senatorsupdate.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wacky.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wacky.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GGSonic2SH.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GGSonic2SH.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Wanna Help?

Let's prove AMIB, Rob, TTN, etc. wrong! I'm recruiting users like you to help me out in fixing the outrage. Can you help? User:SLJCOAAATR 1/Sandbox/Template:Sonic Characters Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 21:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Cody Hodgson

Hey! I noticed that in your recent editing of Cody Hodgson, you moved some information around to places it shouldn't be. Originally, the page had an international play section in the prose area of the article, the same format you can see in the FA and GA articles of hockey players. This way, we can keep the international stats with the career statistics section while having all the prose together (see Eric Brewer (ice hockey) for example). Anyways, I just noticed you moved the international play prose to be with the stats, and by the format of this project, it shouldn't exactly be that way. Just a heads up for future reference! – Nurmsook! ^talk... 21:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't really see how a FA or GA can be considered an exception. If we want all of these articles to become FA or GA eventually, then why wouldn't we want to format them in that direction now? Rather than moving something away from what it should become. You mentioned WP:HOCKEY/PPF, but even it mentions that if you are getting into prose rather than just a list, it could be included with the rest of the prose, as is the case with these "top" articles such as Joe Sakic, Eric Brewer (ice hockey), Dominik Hašek, Martin Brodeur, etc. Also, for your example of Alexei Kovalev, his international play section just lists the tournaments he has played in. It includes no prose, something the Hodgson article does in fact have. So, per the PPF, this is fine. It just seemed off to me that you moved the prose from the Hodgson article away from the rest of the prose, and with that, away from FA and GA standards, which in reality just worsens the format of the article. You can't really compare apples and oranges. I've moved it back to the way it was before for the time being, but if you have any further issues with that, please feel free to share them with me, and if needed, the WikiProject as a whole. But for now, I just really don't get your argument. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 06:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Help...

{{help}} Ok I would like to join the Guitar Hero wiki using the new unified login feature. Is this possible, and if so, how do I do it? Thank you. --Hasek is the best (talk) 02:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

• I don't think unified login works for wikis that aren't part of the Foundation. That one is part of Wikia which is a whole 'nother animal. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

(ec) Unified login works for most projects run by the Wikimedia Foundation. Since Wikia is a different project, run by Wikia Inc., unified login does not work there (However, if I remember right, once you create an account on one wikia, you can use it on any other wikia, although you still have to sign in individually.)--Werdan7^{T @} 02:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Template edits

please do not mess up the formatting of templates, as you did to Template: Sum 41. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 21:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

when you edited it; it got messed up and it went from regular to all stretched out.. possibly from the previous edit before me that you reverted back to. Go ahead and change it back if you want; but make sure it doens't elongate the box. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 22:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Knucklesmarble.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Knucklesmarble.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Joking.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Joking.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SonicCDWarp.png

Thank you for uploading File:SonicCDWarp.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GGSonicDrift.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GGSonicDrift.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DragonsLairNES.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DragonsLairNES.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GGSonicSpinball.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GGSonicSpinball.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GGTailsAdventuretitle.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GGTailsAdventuretitle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Lightswitch.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lightswitch.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Foot hockey

The article Foot hockey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undoubtedly exists, but appears non-notable. No coverage in reliable sources such as newspapers, books or magazines found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Foot hockey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foot hockey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foot hockey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Llama's Koala (talk) 20:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FlickyTScreen.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FlickyTScreen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Labyrinth Plus! Edition

The article The Labyrinth Plus! Edition has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for over three years. A quick look at the WP:VG/MOS custom Google search engine shows up very little results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SonicCDWW1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SonicCDWW1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GGSonicLabyrinth.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GGSonicLabyrinth.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GGSonicTTGT.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GGSonicTTGT.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Labyrinth Plus! Edition

The article The Labyrinth Plus! Edition has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability and lack of sources since 2014. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NVG. Only YouTube videos in Google search, and a couple of passing mentions in XP how-to Google Books search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Miniapolis 02:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Labyrinth Plus! Edition for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Labyrinth Plus! Edition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Labyrinth Plus! Edition until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Miniapolis 20:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Just Disgusting! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just Disgusting!, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Disgusting! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Just Stupid! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just Stupid!, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Stupid! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Disgusting.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disgusting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)