Hasharin
please read regarding sourcing. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Please use review articles. If you use pubmed you can click on a button to the right to limit your search to reviews. We do not typically use primary research.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
July 2020
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Communist Party of China; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Opting for the stronger wording due to article's high visibility. Your last revert was the default unexplained edit summary. Not good CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 01:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Dear CaradrhasAiguo - My edit is correct. The other guy is someone who was arguing with me on Reddit and has tried vandalising the page to win a point. Please block them from making further edits to the page.