Hasnatali1234

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Hasnatali1234!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot

Welcome!

Hello, Hasnatali1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes. You may have problems writing in English, though. Did you know there are Wikipedias in over 300 languages? You may like to help at a Wikipedia in your language instead. Anyway, welcome to the project, and thank you for your changes! If you need help, you can notify me on my talk page, or you can also visit the Teahouse. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 15:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

C

F Hasnatali1234 (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Hasnatali1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 13:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

You need to discuss and obtain a consensus for what the article says about the recent incident on the article talk page not just blindly revert to what you think is the preferred version. And please don't use edit summaries that suggest that you Own the article and that others should stay away. I've templated both you and User:Robyn2425 to encourage you (and other interested editors) to sort things out amicably on the article talk pageNigel Ish (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You continue to blindly revert any changes made to the article, including attempts to make the date format consistent within the article and with the Wikipedia Manual of Style, attempts to remove circular links and misleading links. If you don't stop doing this, you are likely to find yourself blocked once an admin comes to investigate the article.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for protecting the JF17 Thunder article

Thank you for maintaining neutrality and protecting the JF-17 Thunder article. 91.212.53.253 (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)