User talk:Hassocks5489/Archives/2012/January

Latest comment: 12 years ago by NSH001 in topic DYK: Clayton & Black


DYK for St Leonard's Church, St Leonards-on-Sea

The DYK project (nominate) 07:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK issue

DYK nomination of Montpelier Crescent

  Hello! Your submission of Montpelier Crescent at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ealdgyth - Talk 14:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

See - Template:Did you know nominations/Montpelier Crescent; Vernon Terrace, Brighton. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Hounsom Memorial Church

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Montpelier Crescent

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Vernon Terrace, Brighton

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Henry Pillips

I noticed this was in the work, and whaddayaknow, I can genuinely help here! try having a look at Taxonomic Litterature's entry for the guy. It has a pretty comprehensive bibliography and set of further references (though it's a very scholarly work, so many of these may turn out not to be available). I think you'll want to look mostly at the "Biofile" section, if only because the heavily abbreviated references in the other one have to be deciphered by looking at volume 1-3. Circéus (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I had a quick look through a few online refs: Alibone and Johnson are barebone bibliographies and no use. There's a short entry in the first DNB vol. 45:201-202. Fussell, Coats and Chadwick are likely not bibliographic account (though they may be restricted to how philips related to a different person), but they're not online. Circéus (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Duke of York cinema pic

Regarding this edit I'm going to go again and argue the original image is better, at l;east for the list. It seems to me like it does a better job of giving a context to the building (you don't have to show ONLY the building!), and the dramatically symmetric façade leaves your odd side angle in the dust (plus those cars really aren't helping the second image). Given that most details are lost at this small size anyway, I'm going to be bold and revert, okay? I'm sure your new pic (which does a good job of showing the overall size of the building) will find its place when you get 'round to rework the building's article. Circéus (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK: Clayton & Black

  Hello! Your submission of Clayton & Black at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Impressive work, you seem to be as "prolific" as the architects! ---NSH001 (talk) 00:35, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Clayton & Black

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for First Church of Christ, Scientist (Brighton)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Gwydyr Mansions

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for 155–158 North Street, Brighton

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for 163 North Street, Brighton

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)