Heartcalm22

Welcome!

Hello, Heartcalm22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Enric Naval (talk) 10:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

refined sugar

Hello, I don't see any research saying that refined sugar is an actual anti-nutrient. I can only see isolated opinion articles in newspapers, and advocacy websites. As far as I know, sugar is bad only because people taking sugar instead of taking food that has lots of nutrients. See Talk:Antinutrient#refined_sugar --Enric Naval (talk) 10:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Virtual Free University

Hello, Heartcalm22. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Virtual Free University, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Op47 (talk) 20:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

I note that you have deprodded this article, but have not explained why on the talk page. Also, it would help if you would add the template template:oldprodfull and complete the fields.

Also, I note that you have not addressed the concerns that I raised when I prodded your article. Do you have any plans for doing so.

Regards Op47 (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

We are new to your system and have spent considerable time complying with it seems very rigid and complex process that are more mystifying than enlightening ...if you wish to communicate to us about our input then by all means why not do it in a direct fashion ...we have made numerous adjustments to the content and with regards to the issue of "notability" we suggest that you look at the link we have added about "AdBan" and Public Relations in media ...in any case we were to understand that placing in formation about edits in the "edit summary" was sufficient and we have been doing so. Thank you for your consideration.Heartcalm22 (talk) 21:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

We have re-uploaded the logo and registered it as a free of copyright restrictions with wikimedia commons

Orphaned non-free image File:The AdBan Logo (c) 1972 Media Free Times.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The AdBan Logo (c) 1972 Media Free Times.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AdBan

The article AdBan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No reliable sources independent of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim Vickers (talk) 04:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:AdBan - Boycott All Commercial Media (c) 1972 Media Free Times.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:AdBan - Boycott All Commercial Media (c) 1972 Media Free Times.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Virtual Free University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unorthodox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Possible Conflict of Interest

An edit that you made at the talk page of the Virtual University makes it appear that you are a commitee acting on behalf of the Virtual University, rather than a Bona Fida Editor who happens to be writing about the Virtual University. I note the remarks about better understanding that Wikipedia is not for use as an advertising vehicle, but even so, I would appreciate it if you would look at and read around the following link (WP:COI) and determine if and how it affects you. Op47 (talk) 21:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The AdBan Logo (c) 1972 Media Free Times.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:The AdBan Logo (c) 1972 Media Free Times.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)