Helper201

Note - I briefly set up the account User:Helper201V2 when I was having trouble logging into this account. That account only ever engaged in talk about my account and never made any edits. I did not make any edits to any pages with it and will not use it to make any edits unless otherwise stated. This is the one and only account I use.

Welcome!

Hello, Helper201! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Pirate Party UK

Hello. The accounts submitted to the EC actually have this membership figure on them. There used to be a citation on the page showing this but it has since been removed - apparently the citation isn't open to the general public yet, but it should be shortly (it's actually over-due but the snap general election has slowed down the electoral commission some what). It's a bit of a waste of time to edit the graph only to change it back in a week or two - especially when I know the information to be valid.

No body

The mention of the body does not say that she is dead. But it does connect to her late father’s wish to give her a proper Christian burial. If you are willing to accept that, pls undo previous edit. If not, pls mention in the Talk.

Thank you dear for updating Awami league page back to original

Dear, I have noticed that you edited Awami League page back to original one and I'm delighted that you have done that. Unfortunately, users like Vif12vf|,Nzs9|, and ShrewMoon| take down good edits. I strongly advice you to monitor, Awami League page. It is being vandalized by users that are putting on false information and arguing about topics that they do not understand.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 18:47 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop Nzs9 from editing

Nzs9|, is keeping on editing on Awami league page. He does it and then even has it undone. I would advice to monitor him and report him so he gets a ban from editing on Awami league page.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 14:27 20 March 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:D4B6:874C:1C1F:7A6 (talk)

Please read WP:Seealso

Specifically, "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body." This is why you are getting reverted by multiple editors. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Trainsandotherthings my apologies, I didn't see that these were already linked in the main text. Helper201 (talk) 10:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

WEP - Mention in Lead of Parish/Town Councillors

Hi.

I've re-removed the lines mentioning their town or parish level councillors from the article's lead. While it made sense and was notable enough for inclusion in the lead section (and by notable, I'm not referring to the GNG but rather the contents of the article as a whole) when that was their highest level of representation, the fact they now have a councillor elected to a principal authority effectively renders what made the mention of their town/parish councillors as justifiable to mention in the lead moot.

Rambling Rambler (talk) 19:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

It's still notable in terms of the party's overall representation, given how limited it is. Helper201 (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

It's suitable for inclusion within the article, but putting parish and town council seats in the lead when they have higher levels of representation is highly unusual, as the lead is meant to summarise the most important points. Now they have any amount of principal authority representation, the parish/town level is now not the most important level to summarise, similar to how we don't detail the number of councillors in the lead for parties with MPs. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Conservative Party spectrum position

Heya, there’s been some dispute on the talk page for Conservative Party (UK) between another editor and I regarding the correct order and predominant description of the Conservative Party (extending to disagreement about the applicability of some of the sources). I, for one, agree with your edit putting ‘centre-right’ first as the predominant descriptor. I wonder if you would wish to include your opinion on the talk page discussion. Cheers, Will Thorpe (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Willthorpe, thanks for notifying me. I've responded on that talk page. Helper201 (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)