Hemanetwork

Welcome!

Hello, Hemanetwork, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Potrero Ridge, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jusdafax 20:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Potrero Ridge"

A page you created, Potrero Ridge, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jusdafax 20:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Crissy Marsh

I was wondering why you undid my redirect. You said that it is a specific geographic feature, it is in the same place as the Crissy Field, and the article on Crissy Field is much more in depth and referenced. I wonder why you object to having this as one unified article and insint on a second article for the same place. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Hemanetwork. You have new messages at Fiftytwo thirty's talk page.
Message added 21:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario "Souleye" Treadway

A tag has been placed on Mario "Souleye" Treadway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Winner 42 ( Talk to me! ) 00:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Warner Chabor

A tag has been placed on Warner Chabor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sgroupace (talk) 22:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent cut and paste move of the El Cerrito, CA article

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, California a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into El Cerrito, California. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

However, in this case, the "move" function does not work for normal users because El Cerrito, California is currently a disambiguation page that lists different topics and places with that title. Furthermore, a requested move discussion, now archived on Talk:El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, California#Requested move, ended with no consensus (if there were consensus, an administrator would be able to fix the page histories of those two pages). Therefore, please post another request on Wikipedia:Requested moves, since "If there has been any past debate about the best title for the page ... then treat it as controversial".

(And no, I am completely neutral on the matter. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#United States says that "Those places that need even more disambiguation include their county or parish", but does not clearly, specifically state that "all proper cities use city; state and unincorporated communities use community, county, state".) Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Here's why there was no consensus looking at the move discussion (although I cannot read the mind of the admin who closed the discussion, and can only assume based on general Wikipedia guidelines): Nogood was the nominator who initiated the discussion. User:Andrewa then opposed. Next, User:Chrishomingtang said "support". Finally, Nogood posted the second "support" comment – which as the nominator doesn't count when tallying up the supports and oppose comments (i.e. he voted twice).

Therefore you just have the nominator, then a user who said "oppose" and only one user that said "support"; only three users participated in that discussion, not four. And since voting is not a substitute for discussion, there was not enough users and opinions to determine a true consensus. Therefore, I recommend that you proceed with another post at Wikipedia:Requested moves – which I see that you already have. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Admins are usually taught, especially in delete discussions, that if there is "no consensus", than it defaults back to the status quo – which in this case was to keep the city article at El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, California. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Some answers to your questions:

• No, it does not have to be at least four opinions if the closing admin feels that everyone who participated clearly explained their reasons, and clearly explained how their position is obviously supported by one of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
• In advertising your discussion, usually in delete discussions, you are required to post a delete tag on the top of the article. In requested move discussions, the equivalent is Template:Movenotice. Another way is to notifying the WikiProjects that support the page. If you notice at the top of Talk:El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, California, there is a list of those WikiProjects. So you could post a message on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California/San Francisco Bay Area task force and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities.
• The discussion can only be extended at the discretion of the admin closing the discussion. He or she may immediately close it as "no consensus" or "relist it to generate a clearer conensus".
• For pages that are deleted, there is an appeal process that is called Wikipedia:Deletion review. However, in all other cases, including requested moves, decisions are not final and consensus can change. Therefore you can "appeal" by posted another request later on, like you have just done. The usual unwritten rule is to wait a few weeks, because nobody is really going to change their minds immediately after the previous discussions.

I'll probably think of more answers later. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:07, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:45, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Hema has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Hema. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Hmrox (talk) 18:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Sure I understand, but disambiguation pages like Hema only contain lists of links; they don't have graphics on them. If you need some help editing Wikipedia, feel free to post to my talk (and don't forget to sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:40, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article HEMA, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Sven Manguard _Talk 21:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Santa Isabel (supermarkets)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Santa Isabel (supermarkets) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 04:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Santa Isabel (supermarkets). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 05:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Santa Isabel (supermarkets), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 05:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Did You Know?

Hello! Your submission of Santa Isabel (supermarkets) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! matt (talk) 09:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Balneario

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dudesnude

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dudesnude requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Unblocked

Please accept my apologies; in reviewing your edit history, I made a mistake in blocking you due my misinterpretation of your username. I've unblocked the account. Sorry about the inconvenience. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

• No need to request a name change. I've unblocked you. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

It had been tagged for speedy deletion as a NN website which in turn led me to misread your username. I thought you were associated with the site. I'll undelete it right away for you. Thanks for being so kind. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

• OK, all set. The subject matter ain't my thing (that isn't why I deleted it), but to each his own. :) Take care and have a great weekend. Over and out. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Sure, go right ahead. Thanks for asking. If it were to be tagged again, it's not necessarily the end of the article. If notability can be established - and you said that it has - you shouldn't have to worry about it and you can bring it up with whomever tags it should it happen again. Good luck. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Hookup websites

Category:Hookup websites, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 06:57, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Dudesnude for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Dudesnude, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dudesnude until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ttonyb (talk) 16:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

November, 2010

You appear to be edit warring to insert content I have disputed to the Craigslist and other articles. Per Wikipedia's WP:CONSENSUS process it is up to you to establish consensus as the editor proposing to add disputed content. I and other editors have given reasons why your new category about online hookups is not appropriate in general, and I have said in detail why it is not right for the Craigslist article. Further, by accusing me of removing content because I do not like it, you are making an accusation of bad faith editing. Please remain WP:CIVIL. I will remove the content at some point unless you can establish consensus for it. Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 01:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Santa Isabel (supermarkets)

Hello! Your submission of Santa Isabel (supermarkets) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 02:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

I formatted the first ref as an example. I didn't do all of them because they're in Spanish and I might miss something. Use the templates in WP:Citation templates and plug in the appropriate information on each citation. Yoninah (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Please see new note on DYK talk page. Yoninah (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

dudesnude

I suggest you rephrase "According to Alexa rankings the site is the 7,583rd most popular website, making it more popular than competitor and pioneer gay.com and third only to competitor's adam4adam and manhunt.net". Your assumption is that the named sites are the competitors but that depends on an analysis (and definition) of market sector. I would say several other sites might be considered competitors (such as gaydar) and your personal definition of such fails No original research. If you could find a published analysis that lists the competitors in this market then you might have a rationale for including such statements. Fæ (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Oh okay, well its based on the sources that are on the Manhunt.net and Adam4Adam articles and checking their Alexa ratings compared to dudesnude. Perhaps I should just make a table?Hemanetwork (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Sounds a bit like a synthesis problem. You can make such a table but maintaining it in the article would be impossible (it would need updating every 3 months or so) and it would really belong in a parent article about gay online dating sites. It would be better to identify a single notable top competitor and draw comparisons with that site.

With regard to userfication, you could cut&paste a copy of the article into your userspace (like at User:Hemanetwork/dudesnude) or if the file gets deleted then ask the deleting admin for a copy of the last version at the time of deletion. Fæ (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HEMA (Hookers, Escorts and Masseurs Association)

I have nominated this article for deletion. Just FYI. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:26, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Hemanetwork) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

1. It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
2. Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guideline to avoid editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations.The article in question is HEMA (Hookers, Escorts and Masseurs Association). Thank you.

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, your account has been blocked; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 05:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Hemascreenshot.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hemascreenshot.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 19:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Santa Isabel (supermarkets)

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Hemanetwork, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Hemanetwork/test. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

San francisco radio stations listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect San francisco radio stations. Since you had some involvement with the San francisco radio stations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Radio stations in san francisco listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Radio stations in san francisco. Since you had some involvement with the Radio stations in san francisco redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Gioia

The article John Gioia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability - fails WP:POLITICIAN, single sentence quote in a newspaper is not significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD (talk) 09:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Gioia

The article John Gioia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:POLITICIAN - none of the sources appear to offer more than a mention of his holding his local elected position, not the "significant coverage in reliable sources" needed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD (talk) 21:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Other specified adverse effects not elsewhere classified listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other specified adverse effects not elsewhere classified. Since you had some involvement with the Other specified adverse effects not elsewhere classified redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)