Heronjoms
Joined 15 January 2020
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Girth Summit in topic Blocked as a sockpuppet
Large UK listed Companies
editYou seem to have added a series of hat notes to companies that are listed in the FTSE 250 Index. WP:LISTED referring to "listed companies" says "sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports." Other editors have already added a number of sources: please help by adding more rather than just tagging articles. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 23:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Fact is that these are nothing more than placeholder articles that would be unlikely to survive a WP:AfD. Rather than complaining, please make an effort to improve. Heronjoms (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have spent most of the last 15 years doing just that! Dormskirk (talk) 23:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- You seem to be edit-waring now but tagging more and more which is not constructive. Dormskirk (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Fact remains that notability is not demonstrated in any of these articles. Rather than complaining, you could focus your efforts on improving these articles so the lack of notability issue would no longer apply. Heronjoms (talk) 00:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please read properly what I said above: many of these are listed on the FTSE 250 Index. That alone demonstrates notability. Dormskirk (talk) 00:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Fact remains that notability is not demonstrated in any of these articles. Rather than complaining, you could focus your efforts on improving these articles so the lack of notability issue would no longer apply. Heronjoms (talk) 00:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- You seem to be edit-waring now but tagging more and more which is not constructive. Dormskirk (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have spent most of the last 15 years doing just that! Dormskirk (talk) 23:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:S4hour per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D47817. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 12:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.