Hervard123
|
April 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Grossglockner has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bexample\.com (links: http://www.example.com, http://www.example.com (redirect from http://www.example.com)).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Remember the Golden Rule: Treat others as you would have them treat you.” Well, let me quote from your contributions:
- what the f... are you
- je idiot,...
Catch 22: The alleged “proof” that you present is an old mirror of the WIKIPEDIA article. So you have come full circle. Concerning your way of “argumenting” I suggest you study Begging the question here in WP.
There is no proof that Friedrich Welwitsch was a Slovene. Otherwise his father would not have him baptized with three German Christian names. But the family name points at a Slovene ancestor. This is what the text says.
Names used to be Germanized in those days – but in Slovene textbooks such name-changing is still done the other way round. Many historic German names appear in a Slovenicized form – Johann Weichard for instance appears as Janež Vajkard (Valavasor), or Auersperg as Auršperk, or even Turjak, and Andreas von Auersperg is given as Andrej Turjaški, but this does not prove that these people were actually Slovenes. You don’t believe that Sveti Mohor was a Slovene just because the Greek name of Hermagoras always appears as Mohor in Slovene, or do you?
Not everybody with a Slovene-sounding name is a Slovene - just as not every Grafenauer or Türk, Tischler or Zwitter (or, in the Czech Republic, Klaus and Fischer) is a German.
Also: Here in WP.en you are now part of a supra-national community This is an English-language WP, where the edits should not reflect national sentiments or customs. Let’s stick to sheer facts, shall we? The text says the family name “Welwitsch” points at Slovene ethnicity. Since there is no proof that he actually was a Slovene, can’t we leave it at that?--Marschner (talk) 14:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Edit warring
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Friedrich Welwitsch. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Eleassar my talk 07:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)