User talk:Hfaith/sandbox

Peer Review

Hi there Faith, you did a really nice job drafting this article! I thought that you were able to add a lot of great detail to the article, and backed that up with great sources. I checked them, and they all seemed to be relevant, and you did a great job of putting the information into your own words. I also thought that your lead section is short, and consise, including the information necessary to give a high level overview of what the rest of the article will be about. I do think that once you move your article to the mainspace, you should move your references section that is currently at the top of yoru page, to the end of the article, and delete the reference template that is cuerrently at the bottom of your sandbox. One thing I noticed, was that the last sentence in your lead paragraph is quite wordy. I think that you could split it up into two sentences to create a better flow. I also think that you should take out the first sentence under morphology, since it already included in your lead paragraph, it might be considered repetitive. I think you can add some more links to other wikipedia articles for words such as: genera, Pteriodspermatophyta, gymnosperms, fossil, North America, Europe, and xylem. --Ivizulis (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)