HfxCJP

This is HfxCJP's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Poole (December 1)

Latest comment: 11 months ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jordan Poole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HfxCJP! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but dropping in a bunch of links is not going to help. Please look at an actual article for a notable actor. You need to write text that is verified by secondary sources. Also, that table of awards, it's fancy but it's not clear, in large part because of the inline URLs. And what you really need is not primary links, links to organizational websites, but you need citations for--again, secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 23:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

thank you.. yes, I just realized that now and am fixing it. I made the the mistake of just putting links and forgot to make them citations.. apologies HfxCJP (talk) 23:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

No apology necessary--and no worries. Just keep in mind that every reviewer will have WP:GNG in mind, and they'll look for secondary sources. Good luck! Drmies (talk) 23:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I assume I have to publish every time I want to save? as long as I put a not in about what I did and that I am not finished working on it?

Cheers and thanks again for your assistance. HfxCJP (talk) 23:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Poole (December 2)

Latest comment: 11 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jordan Poole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello.. thank you for taking the time to review.. but I am starting to get a bit confused. I was told to look at other notable wiki pages for people that are on here.. and I am posting the same amount of info... is it the format I am putting the info in? here is the example I went from : Devyn Nekoda

Please help if you have the time...

Cheers HfxCJP (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Jordan Poole

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, HfxCJP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jordan Poole".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic