Hello, Highfield1730! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

-- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timtrent (talkcontribs)

Please do not

edit

Please do not edit this page because I believe that this article is important for people wanting to know information about this sucessful school. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by StrawberryCheesecake66 (talkcontribs)

I moved this note from your userpage to your user talk page, hope that's okay. Cirt (talk) 12:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thank you cirt. StrawberryCheesecake66 please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not Highfield1730 (talk), specifically WP:NOTMEMORIAL 12:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

SIG SG 550

edit

Hi. Er, we moved it to the Gallery to avoid any edit wars. One of the warrers was quite abusive and is currently under investigation (something to do with "BITE" and "Filipino bandits"). It was moved to the gallery after a discussion over whether the image was even needed on the page ended with us agreeing to a neutral solution... The fight was due to a small percentage of the firearm being seen in the small, low quality image.

We're still going through a solution to the argument and so until we reach a verdict, the image is placed in the gallery. Sorry for any inconvenience, -- OsirisV (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Quite abusive" is quite the abusive term. I'd like to defend myself, but it's hard to do when my edits are mischaracterized. Please do not fiddle with the article mid-consensus building discussion. OsirisV and I actually agree, but his edit warring was getting in the way of productivity. That's stopped, please discuss rather than perpetuate the edit war. --Nukes4Tots (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Order on Military police of the United Kingdom

edit

Guess you haven't seen it yet, raised on Talk:Military police of the United Kingdom. ninety:one 21:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Revertion of my edit to CCF

edit

You reverted my edit to the page about CCF about ranks under the grounds of no cititation. However coperal is the same as bombadier and, being in the CCF, is used at some places. --Imagine Wizard (talk contribs count) Iway amway Imagineway Izardway. 13:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply