Hilitec

Proposed deletion of MultiOTP

Hello, Hilitec. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, MultiOTP, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. - Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

--Hilitec (talk) 21:53, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the info, I've added some third-party references

Speedy deletion nomination of MultiOTP

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MultiOTP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MrOllie (talk) 14:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello MrOllie, thanks for your feedback, it talks now only about a completely free and open source solution, worlwide used in order to provide strong authentication for free. Additional technical explanations have been written in order to explain better how it works and how the commmunity could benefit of this library. All references have been checked and do not link to any commercial products. I didn't create to much articles, but let me know if I still need to remove external links. I checked several other articles about the same topics and I didn't see any structure difference. Any comments welcome, I'm always interested about improving my articles in wikipedia. --Hilitec (talk) 14:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)