Hillel
Just curious...why didn't your restore to the sourced correction that I had provided? --AustinKnight 22:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Never mind...I see what you're referencing now. This is a second-hand description, and one not consistent with the original Hebrew version of Genesis that I referred to. If the Tanakh calls it, directly, an angel, I'll defer...but second-hand descriptions will necessarily be erroneous...no offense intended. --AustinKnight 22:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
To review the source for the original (and free, by the way) Hebrew version of Genesis (an interlinear translation is provided...you do not need to read Hebrew) see the link. Cheers, --AustinKnight 22:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
It's not a matter, really, of agreement or disagreement. The source document, i.e., the Tanakh or the original Hebrew Old Testament -- with a direct translation -- can solve this pretty quickly. I'm fine with either one, but would gladly defer to the Tanakh for obvious reasons. Using some 3rd-party's read into this, on the other hand, is not ideal...especially when the true source documents are readily available. This is truly a very simple sourcing issue. If Genesis is not being used for the source, then the Tanakh should be referenced. --AustinKnight 22:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Lo and behold...Wikipedia has the following in the Jacob article: "...a mysterious being ("a man", according to Genesis 32:24, or "the angel", according to Hosea 12:4) appeared and wrestled with Jacob until daybreak."
In other words, this will boil down to a choice, in the Tanakh, between the Torah and Genesis, or the Nevi'im and Hosea.
Do you have a reason for picking Hosea over Genesis...? --AustinKnight 23:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
The NYT
editWhy did you go to the effort of removing the capital "The" from The New York Times link in The Washington Post article? It is part of the paper's official name, right on the masthead, which is why "The" is part of the article name. - DavidWBrooks 11:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Rebecca J. Nelson
editI've unearthed a bit more information about this person, you may want to change your vote on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rebecca_J._Nelson. Thanks. Crypticfirefly 05:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
How's the issue with the user from Es:Wikipedia coming along? Do we know what's going on yet? -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 04:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
You have contributed to Memons page. The Siddique Katiya has created a duplicate article of Memon as Memons. The Memon article deals with Memons and the Memons page was a redirect. Siddique Katiya removed the redirect tag [1] on 18:50, 9 May 2006 and created a duplicate article. I have requested a merge of both articles. But this tag was removed. I want these articles to be merged and make Memons page again a redirect as it was on [2] 7 May 2006 or it should be deleted. Siddiqui 21:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother
editI'm sorry, but are you not aware of the use of quotations marks (in North American terminology); inverted commas [" "] in UK terminology? These are symbols to indicate that the material occurring between these symbols is directly quoted from the source. You should not change material that appears in quotation marks (or inverted commas, if you prefer). Mrs Roosevelt's written comments used the ampersand [&] and because she is directly quoted -- that is what we use quotation marks (or inverted commas) for. So it is not proper to change the ampersand to "and" as you have done. Of course if the material were being indirected quoted, and without quotation marks (or inverted commas), it would be proper to make the change you made. The use of quotation marks (or inverted commas) is quite well understand among native speakers of English, whether they are in North America or the UK. It is generally something that is taught in school to children at around age 10, and perhaps it would be better if you did not interfere in this manner: I am assuming that you come to the English language as a relative newcomer. Masalai 11:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Apologies
editOn further reflection I extend my apologies for the above: I must have seemed patronising in the extreme, whereas I have a great deal of sympathy and admiration for those who come to English as a second language. My congratulations to you for dealing with the English-as-a-second-language issue so bravely. And good luck to you. Masalai 20:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Hillel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit Hello, Hillel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Hillel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:Mac OS
editCategory:Mac OS games is up for renaming, please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 28#Category:Mac OS software. – Fayenatic London 16:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)