June 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 05:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Himanshushukla433 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Himanshushukla433 (talk) 18:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC) hey i understand what i did was wrong and it does not comply with the wikipedia policy i understand my mistake and request you for a second chance i have gathered more refrences and information about the page i was working on it was not an advertisement i just happened to see her on doordarshan a tv channel in india and wanted to write about her thank you i hope you understandReply

Decline reason:

I find your explanation that you simply saw Richa Jain on a TV show and decided to, not just attempt to create an article, but to write multiple drafts and articles over a series of months and despite many warnings, very implausible. That you are still determined to recreate the article despite being blocked for this specific activity demonstrates that this is likely undisclosed paid editing or you have a conflict of interest. This appeal is declined as it is clear that you intend to continue the same disruption and it fails to address the abuse of multiple accounts. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Himanshushukla433 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Himanshushukla433 (talk) 19:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)i understand now and will not continue to write about richa jain and will help the community improve and i understand my mistakes and about abuse of multiple accounts i needed some time to get more refrences and i was new in the space and there was a speedy deletion on my article so i was just scared that i might loose what i have written i m sorry and will not continue these kind of acts further thank youReply

Decline reason:

Using multiple accounts while you have this unblock request open as evidenced by the latest report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Himanshushukla433 while committing here not to use multiple accounts shows you either do not understand why you were blocked or are being distruptive. If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to cease evading this block by using any account or IP address to edit and follow the unblock process. If you evade further you may find future unblock requests are declined. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain exactly what you will edit instead. You'll also want to address your use of multiple accounts directly. !ɘM γɿɘυϘ⅃ϘƧ 12:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Himanshushukla433 (talk) 08:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)I will fix the dead or broken links and i will look for grammatical mistakes on the articles and fix themReply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Himanshushukla433, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

aeschylus (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Himanshushukla433. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply